Naw I'd say no none of your fucking business.
i believe that would cause refusal of the license no?
Naw I'd say no none of your fucking business.
lol I know man. CDL, Confusion drivers license.soo...are we talking about health care, hiipa, medical insurance, commercial drivers license, or california drivers license???
Personally, I think Obamacare will be repealed by this time next year. It's too unpopular. Senators, Congressmen, and the Presdiential candidate (4 years from now) will not risk their political careers on a well-intentioned but deeply flawed piece of legislation.1. Government [power] is still unlimited.
2. Mitt Romney is still lame.
3. Health care costs will still soar.
It's been a while, at least five years since I've had to take a written test. The only reason I had to was because I got my M1 motorcycle endorsement. Yes, I am that good a driver.Dont they have the "do you use any illegal drugs" question on a cdl app?
If so holding a rec and answering no would be tantamount to perjury.
So like a ccw the law does not say a rec precludes the ability to hold a permit but unless you plan to perjure yourself....
soo...are we talking about health care, hiipa, medical insurance, commercial drivers license, or california drivers license???
I fucking agree, I sat in many govt buldings, dealing from ssi, to foodstamps, and let me tell you, once you depend on govt, you lose period, and yes if they have a say so you aint smoking shite, hell look around, even today our current news is showing the current attacks on legit card holders, and ppl who harm no one, plus fuck the feds, they Keep no stats of child crimes, so fuck em if they think they can make mmj worst than fuckin a kid!Well looks like the party is over. With the courts blessing fed run healthcare is here. Now what does that mean for MMJ? Well if the past court rulings are any indication, it means the end of mmj. Why do I say this you ask. It has been established several times in that the Feds position of mmj having "no medical value" is supreme. Your employer can still fire you if are a mmj patient. You can't have a CdL if you are MMJ. The logical situation shoul follow that if the Feds now run healthcare and according to them there is no such thing as MMJ, that they will either deny you care or deny you MMJ.
I would love to Hear from the naieve who think this isn't a certainty.
It's been a while, at least five years since I've had to take a written test. The only reason I had to was because I got my M1 motorcycle endorsement. Yes, I am that good a driver.
I honestly don't recall that question being on the paperwork I filled out for the DMV. However, were it to be there I would answer, honestly, NO, I do not use any illegal drugs (or legal drugs illegally). MMJ is not illegal, and the California DMV is not tasked with enforcement of federal law, they fall under state laws.
they had a case in CO where they were trying to force a person to either choose a cdl, or their mmj license, not both... don't know what came of it though...?
here, they just ruled that mmj still qual's under the zero tol policy of dui's... so if a trooper smells it, or your eyes look glazed over, or you show them u'r mmj card... they can force a blood draw, and if you even have metabolites in your system (which we all would)... zero tol policy is put into effect.
just off the top of my head... fuckers.
I had a great discussion with an ICmager the other day. It seems we should all get Marinol scripts. Then if we are EVER pulled over we DENY DENY DENY cannabis consumption and ANY matabolites are there because of the LEGAL Marinol and the cops can go fuck off.
The should fuck off anyway, but with a Marinol script they can't fuck us with fake cannabis UI's.
FUCK'EM all.
Perhaps, but my understanding is that they don't test for THC or CBD but only metabolites. Additionally CBD is a non intoxicant so having CBD's in one's system is not evidence of intoxication.
The whole weed UI thing is a crock of shit and should be defeated by any means necessary. A marinol script should stop the pigs in their tracks.
In point of fact I don't care about them or their laws. I refrain from stealing and murdering, not because it is illegal, but rather because it is against MY ethics.
This great society that thinks its laws are superior to my ethics doesn't impress me.
Yet here we've just learned that certain baby care products can produce a false positive. If that's the case, then how is it that "they" can't tell the difference there?
http://blog.norml.org/2012/04/10/yet-another-way-drug-testing-fails-baby-products-linked-to-false-positive-drug-test-results-in-newborns/They concluded: “We have identified commonly used soap and wash products used for newborn and infant care as potential causes of false positive THC screening results. Such results in this population can lead to involvement by social services or false child abuse allegations. Given these consequences, it is important for laboratories and providers to be aware of this potential source for false positive screening results and to consider confirmation before initiating interventions.”
hey guess what california courts and institutions are getting their balls back today. go read all the news.