Clowd11:
You are always so rude. I am here to have a civil debate. Throwing insults around doesnt impress anyone.
Your link proves that the Maunder minumum lasting 70 years was directly attributed to the power (or lack there of) of our star.
Cosmic rays havent been studied enough with regards to weather/climate.
However, we know that variable solar activity doesn't result in the Earth's tendency to retain heat the way that warming gasses do.
Here's an example. You run a club that's always overcrowded. One of your assistants tells you, "Hey mon, the club entrance is too big!", while your other assistant says, "Nah mon, you got the exit locked."
Mind and or population control is one of the more bizarre assertions I've come across. I grew up on the county side of the city-limits. Across the street, city residents had fluoride in their water and our hood had private wells. The only difference? Our side typically has fillings in their teeth and the other doesn't.As for fluoride it is proven beyond reasonable doubt that it is very harmful if ingested. Especially as the stuff put in the water supply is literally toxic waste. A by-product of aluminium smelting or phospate mining.
Is oxygen used as the main ingredient in rat poison?
Fluoride contains uranium as a by product of phosphate mining.
We're talking over 6 decades, generations of families in the hundreds. Counting those who've moved in or out over time, probably thousands. There's never been anything attributed to town's water fluoride treatments, other than the occasional government mind-control conspiracy stuff.
And the few fluoride warriors we occasionally run across go from one conspiracy to the next.
Silver, any one of the chemicals that is used to purify water at treatment plants is toxic. As these chemicals are purged from the final product, they also meet the classification of toxic waste.
Many elements are mined in environments that appear unsuitable for human health. Thanks to science, we know how much we may benefit from something as well as how much will hurt.
I could understand you suggesting the health risks outweigh the benefits. But where's the proof? IMO, the mind-control thing is too edgy to swallow. That's old John Birch ramblings that had a government conspiracy for every day of the week.
Says..... ?We get all the natural fluroide we need from a healthy and balanced diet.
More C02 also means moreMadL:
The NASA link was aimed in the direction of space weather. Under-estimate the sun at our peril. The meat of my post was however the climate change NASA agrees is happening across our solar system.
Why is is happening to all the planets at the same time?
Like i said i agree on methane and other man made tragedies. I have a specific beef with carbon being the driver of climate.
I liked your link that showed more c02 = more green stuff
severe rain
severe drought
severe cold
severe heat
rising oceans (where the majority of the world's population happens to reside.)
Imagine having your setup dialed in and the only way you retain control is by managing every aspect. When one environmental factor goes whack, so does your operation.
You say C02 is good for plants, no argument there. But instead of compensating your C02 supplemented grow with more water, ferts and heat, you have...
periods of drenched medium
periods of arid medium
periods of stress inducing heat
periods of stress inducing cold
(I think you get the pic.)
The argument that rising C02 levels will increase crop production is silly. It argues the subject away instead of understanding it.