sac beh
Member
What you are suggesting is commonly referred to as "reinventing the wheel".
Or, trying to use the square when the wheel has been proven more effective for moving objects.
What you are suggesting is commonly referred to as "reinventing the wheel".
well that's certainly an original perspective. Perhaps you could expand on it a little.
I see what you're saying. All that "book learning" is a waste of time, and the army of scientists across the world advancing human knowledge are now redundant, because all we need is for you to spark up a joint and share your insights. It's cosmic man, far out.
Of course you don't care what the scientists say, they have a limited outlook bogged down by irrelevancies like facts and empirical data. What have the scientists ever done for us?
I read about growing weed before I did it. I'm very glad that I did, as it allowed me to benefit from the culmulative experience of thousands of growers. What you are suggesting is commonly referred to as "reinventing the wheel".
if the atom is the building block of everything, then if there is an answer to the ultimate truth, it is hidden in the atom...lol, this is why this thing was built, and why there is a lot of money being pumped into projects that study the atom
Indeed, why waste money on particle accelerators when we could get more reliable data by supplying you with drugs....personally I think there are better ways to spend money
When you first read the label on a bottle of bleach, which advised you not to drink it, did you accept someone else's word for it or did you make a point of finding out through your own personal experience?...yes, in reality, as a whole, they have made more problems than solutions, creators are the ones who have created products and services that has helped humanity, and even if they were scientists themselves, the part of them that was the "creator" was the one that made something useful.
I'm just saying personal experience is what counts, even if you get information from somewhere else, you still have to make it your own personal "experience."
...you, at least to write a very "intelligent post," pretty much, just
like the rest of your posts in this forum!...
another wave of ascension is completed
I felt the energy this morning.
The only real scientists are the ones studying the atom, and how
reality is created through it. This is only common sense since the
atom is the building block of the Universe.
the 10-10-10 thread...what is your opinion?
No opinions here.....I thought this tread was about fertilizer, oooppss
Could that have been the THC binding to the CB1 receptors in your brain?
No my friend, you cant smoke pot while your sleep.
An atom is a long way up the scale from elementary particles. It hasn't been a candidate for being the "building block of everything" for well over a century. Does the term "sub-atomic" sound familiar? Do you know what electricity is?
A quark is an elementary particle and a fundamental constituent of matter.
Quarks combine to form composite particles called hadrons, the most stable
of which are protons and neutrons, the components of atomic nuclei.
Due to a phenomenon known as color confinement, quarks are never found
in isolation; they can only be found within hadrons. For this reason, much
of what is known about quarks has been drawn from observations of the
hadrons themselves.
Indeed, why waste money on particle accelerators when we could get more reliable data by supplying you with drugs.
When you first read the label on a bottle of bleach, which advised you not to drink it, did you accept someone else's word for it or did you make a point of finding out through your own personal experience?
okay, "basic" building block, since no one knows how deep the
rabbit hole goes, and the sub-atomic particles are part of the atom
I want to know if anyone's tried giving blowbacks to someone while they're dreaming. This is research which needs to be done now, by someone else.
El Toker, from my perspective, if I saw a million people jump
off the bridge, and there were scientists standing next to
this bridge and saying, yes it has been scientifically proven
that you can jump off the bridge and have everything you
ever dreamed off and eternal life...I wouldn't jump.
I very much doubt that to be honest. I'm really struggling to think of anything that would convince me or most sane people of the neccessity of jumping off a suspension bridge.The majority of people that look to scientists or gurus or
religion leaders...would jump...lol
Indeed, as we have this conversation, me sat in my home in the UK, you in whatever institution you live in, communicating over the Internet, I can't think of a single thing that science has ever done for us.I don't see the difference between those three types of
authority figures, they are basically operating from the
same structure...the only difference is the "content" they
deliver to their believers/followers.
So your answer is that truth is a value?I believe in thinking for myself and asking one primary
question...
"What is the truth?" and consider truth to be
more important than other values.
To be honest it doesn't seem to have gone well for you so far.And it is obvious to me that "truth" exists, and it is up to me
to find it and not wait for someone to bring it to me on a
platter.
So your answer is that truth is a value?