what made him think this kid was suspicious?
what action?
he profiled him before he saw him commit a crime or he would have had a crime to report
what made that child so different that he could not be "a neighborhood kid"?
his hoodie? or his color? because he did not report to the police a crime in process only suspicion of one, suspicion for which the cause of has yet to be revealed
look at prisons and see how the dynamic of violent minds and racism play off of each other and give this scenario a good consideration and ask yourself how race wouldn't be a factor in the marginalization of this kid?
I'm not saying that race is or isn't a factor what I'm saying is it's irrelevent to the real problem which as I see it is that this guy felt justified to draw and fire a lethal weapon and there is little accountability afterwards judging whether or not it was actually justified. Personally I think that someone who was as easily motivated as this Zimmerman guy seems to have been (by the way the kid was dressed) such a person should not be legally allowed to carry a gun. Police who are considered much more qualified because it's part of their job, have to go thru all sorts of scrutiny whenever they discharge their weapons which is typically in much more threatening scenarios. So why should this guy be allowed to possibly keep carrying and potentially using his gun and all he has to do is say "I felt threatened"? Perhaps if one had to justify themselves more then that they might not be so quick to use lethal force?