If it had not been for medical marijuana, there would NOT be the current situation around the world where cannabis laws are changing. If it had been the rec users pushing for change, with no mention of medical, the laws would still be as they were 20 years ago.
This constant gripping by rec users that they are getting a hard deal out of this is quite sad. Med use has brought this issue to international prominence and I applaud that.
Given time, the law on rec use may be reviewed, but as was said earlier in this thread, there are some difficult issues with that.
http://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=107333
This is the heart of the matter. We recreational users feel like we were here first. Some of us also feel that legalization through the the 'medical marijuana' route is short-sighted.
Example- How about wine, which has medical benefits. Do you want to have to have a prescription to buy a friggin' bottle of wine? Or would you rather be able to just buy a bottle of wine with proof of age, or even, gasp, make some wine? We're not talking about crack.
What's next, vegetables? 'Sir, do you have a permit for those carrots?'
Your argument that we should make it available as medicine first, don't make it with me, because you know as well as I do, that once the government gets its' hooks in it, they won't let go. As far as I'm concerned, calling marijuana 'medical' is giving ammunition to the enemy in the long run.
"Oh, you can't smoke marijuana for fun, it's only for sick people." And fuck that. Thank you.