bitchin bout biden
- Thread starter eugenegreen
- Start date
Sunshineinabag
Active member
Slychiatry
I would love this idea to come to fruition,finally a reality show worth watching
As long as the public stops being brutalized by cops. It would be a great show that puts a light on this issue. Cops need!! to be held responsible for their poor choices violating our rights.
Agreed ! The public/ law abiding folk should not be abused by police,no arguments here. 
Agreed ! The public/ law abiding folk should not be abused by police,no arguments here.
We all broke the law at some point my law abiding friend lol.. Everyone deserves to be treated with dignity and not abused because we broke the law.
hahaha yes depending on the crime.
Someone growing / moving some weed is a totally different category than child rapist,and murderers.
I take my hat off to cops who can arrest some of these scum without putting hands on them.
I'm talking about the real evil fuckers that dont deserve 3 hots & a cot....just my opinion,I know that's not an acceptable stance , but I'm not gonna change my opinion,as I would not expect you to.
Someone growing / moving some weed is a totally different category than child rapist,and murderers.
I take my hat off to cops who can arrest some of these scum without putting hands on them.
I'm talking about the real evil fuckers that dont deserve 3 hots & a cot....just my opinion,I know that's not an acceptable stance , but I'm not gonna change my opinion,as I would not expect you to.
not that I was involved with this particular back and forth
but this is the core of dealing with innocent until proven guilty
this is damn tough to do where it seems obvious a heinous crime has been committed
until you review many a situation and you find not all obvious situations were so obvious after all
the remedy is not obvious to me
I would hope those crimes are not being committed by most. Rich Political hacks like Trump do them frequently and get away with it.
prove it or it's just more bullshit.
'Boogieman'
Well-known member
I think he misses Trump dearly...
You guys don't care about proof. There's no point. Only what Trump tells you is proof. Why you people continue to worship these scumbags is beyond me. . Ill never do shit like that with any of those scumbags.
...so, no proof then, just more bullshit.
DeSantis signs bill requiring Florida students, professors to register political views with state
Universities may lose funding if staff and students' beliefs do not satisfy Florida's GOP-run legislature
https://www.salon.com/2021/06/23/de...ssors-to-register-political-views-with-state/
Supreme court sides with corporations who are accused of child slavery
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/suprem...companies-in-case-alleging-wrongdoing-abroad/
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/suprem...companies-in-case-alleging-wrongdoing-abroad/
https://greenwald.substack.com/p/a-c...addows-viewers
A Court Ruled Rachel Maddow's Viewers Know She Offers Exaggeration and Opinion, Not Facts
"
just like Tucker and the rest of them.
A Court Ruled Rachel Maddow's Viewers Know She Offers Exaggeration and Opinion, Not Facts
"
On one hand, a viewer who watches news channels tunes in for facts and the goings-on of the world. MSNBC indeed produces news, but this point must be juxtaposed with the fact that Maddow made the allegedly defamatory statement on her own talk show news segment where she is invited and encouraged to share her opinions with her viewers. Maddow does not keep her political views a secret, and therefore, audiences could expect her to use subjective language that comports with her political opinions.
Thus, Maddow’s show is different than a typical news segment where anchors inform viewers about the daily news. The point of Maddow’s show is for her to provide the news but also to offer her opinions as to that news. Therefore, the Court finds that the medium of the alleged defamatory statement makes it more likely that a reasonable viewer would not conclude that the contested statement implies an assertion of objective fact."
Thus, Maddow’s show is different than a typical news segment where anchors inform viewers about the daily news. The point of Maddow’s show is for her to provide the news but also to offer her opinions as to that news. Therefore, the Court finds that the medium of the alleged defamatory statement makes it more likely that a reasonable viewer would not conclude that the contested statement implies an assertion of objective fact."
just like Tucker and the rest of them.
Damn dude, you have issues reading.. Refer back to my post for the answer.
there was no answer homeslice, just more of the same bullshit.
Get some glasses cracka. As we can see you can't read for shit.
