medikush13
New member
I agree the lines are pretty wavy at the moment. If they set up a non profit collective correctly that should fall into the correct guidelines right? I mean non profits can and are one of the largest profit generating business models around. You can make a ton but you just claim and redirect differently to follow specific non profit guidelines.
[The Not For Profit is very much different than a Non-Profit 501c-3) It is not a profit generating vehicle, although anyone can set up their business model however they want, and it will be up to the courts to decide if it fit in with what you are supposed to be doing.]
I don't get the storefront ability myself as far as the bill was written but also don't see how patients can access the meds without that being possible. I doubt it was to allow patients to go meet other patients through craigslist and hope they don't get scammed or jacked and hopefully was written to allow patients safe access to their medication through a reputable collective or club. [The collective model is what was intended, not over the counter sales at clubs on every corner]
I like how open ended the bill is because it allows wiggle room on our end BUT that also leaves room for those trying to close down these bills wiggle room as well.
What bugs me most is that it will end up being something else regulated by the federal government that ends up costing even more and patients NOT being allowed to grow their own. [I don't think that will happen because we will always be able to grow our own. This will be more for those who can't.]
See my responses above.