genkisan said:as get the monkey off.
Hahahaha.....exactly......wonder where humans got that phrase from.
genkisan said:as get the monkey off.
G. Sensi said:Well if I were to say Im human because I have hair or arms or legs... my argument would be flawed because lots of living creatures have all of those things... The point is that Learning and being taught something is not unique to the Homo Sapiens therefore doesnt prove that I or any of us are human...
Bless
-G
Clarence said:Hahahaha.....exactly......wonder where humans got that phrase from.
I didnt really read any of the other definitions as they refered to Star wars, Rod Stewart, Death metal and Dungeons and dragons....maryj315 said:Humans, or human beings, are bipedal primates belonging to the mammalian species Homo sapiens (Latin: "wise man" or "knowing man") in the family Hominidae (the great apes)
accessndx said:Wow...that was a super-ultra-hyper-cut & paste....I'm afraid my optic nerves have sustained irreparable damage...
G. Sensi said:As you said:
I didnt really read any of the other definitions as they refered to Star wars, Rod Stewart, Death metal and Dungeons and dragons....
But Isnt the definition quoted exactly what H3ads bein sayin all along?
We cannot really prove to be Human without proving we are Homo Sapiens... And we can only really prove we are Homo Sapiens thru our genetic make-up ie DNA....
-G
maryj315 said:Accessndx nothing gets by you so what are your thoughts on this subject or are you just going to troll the thread
G. Sensi said:We didnt teach ourselves everything we know...
What kind of animals do planes look like? My guess is Birds...
What kind of shape do under water vessels look like? My guess is Fish...
We learned to hunt from the Lions, Tigers and other predators...
We learned where to find clean water from animals....
This list goes on and on...
Man is Man... Thats without a doubt... maybe we can build cars, but I really hate when people talk like we are so much more superior than animals... they've been here "survivng" far longer than we have...
We are also the only species that Kills itself "cus he looked at me"....
gramsci.antonio said:those are convention, that even a stupid computer could learn.
If i point something with my smallest finger, rather than the usual one, you'll still look where i'm pointing rather than looking at the finger. This is abstraction: the capability of using yet known things to solve new problems.
And this is the big leap forward that human being met: the neanderthalians had a bigger brain, but the sapiens had more capibility of abstraction, and thus (maybe) we won.
Anyhow there's been several tries is finding abstraction in animals, but no one suceed. You can teach the animal for sure, but there's no evidence of original behaviour.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_human_behaviour
genkisan said:Humans are not the only animals who fuck for pleasure by a long shot.
Dolphins, as previously mentioned. Here is a short quote from Wiki, the footnote numbers refer to the studies from which the info was taken:
Another very well known species that fuck fer fun are Bonobo chimps.
Bonobos screw face to face, engage in oral and anal sex, masturbate, have threesomes and gay sex and use sex for a hell of a lot more than just makin' babies. It plays a crucial role in their societal structure, and is used to create bonds and alliances as well as get the monkey off.
As well, homosexual behavior (from brief dalliances to same sex life partnering) has been observed in well over 400 different species including gorillas, chimps, many birds, dolphins etc......and that sure ain't fer makin' babies.
Please inform yourself about the things you comment on before you post...it just makes ya look silly.
And it is precisely this whole bullshit attitude of "we are superior to all other things on this planet "yada yada" that has gotten us teetering on the brink of extinction clutching out Big Macs.
Mebbe if we saw the rest of the world's inhabitants as fellow travellers on this funky wet mudball as opposed to inferior things put here for us to kill, displace and destroy, we would not be midst of destroying our only home....and bragging about it.
maryj315 said:Just finished up some reading on Bonobos interesting shit
Mj
Seriously take a bow Genkisan!! That post deserves a round of applause!!genkisan said:Besides, as conceited anthrocentric humans we tend to define intelligence and the like by what we have evolved....mainly language and tool using.
What would be a useful form of intelligence for a human is very different than what would be useful for a dolphin.....so because it does not fit our narrow definition of intelligence, we discount it.
A good example of what I am talking about can be seen in a story about Koko the gorilla. She was once given an IQ test designed for human children, and one of the questions showed four items (ice cream cone, house, flower and something else) and asked which one is good to eat. She she gave "flower" as her answer...because she happens to like eating flowers better than ice cream.
This is merely a small example of how erroneous it is to try and judge the intelligence/sentience of other animals by our standards.
There is a HUGE trans-species cultural gap that makes defining intelligence/sentience other than our own very difficult.
Not having the ability to discern exactly what an animal is thinking makes your entire line of reasoning flawed. Just because human's are too dumb to find it does not mean it is not there... To say there is no evidence of Animals having their own will and ideas about what they want and when they want it and how to get it (sometimes in a manner which they have not been taught) demonstrates an incomplete perspective imho.gramsci.antonio said:Anyhow there's been several tries is finding abstraction in animals, but no one suceed. You can teach the animal for sure, but there's no evidence of original behaviour.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_human_behaviour
You prove that animals do not know. You were the one who made the assertion that you completely understand every aspect of what occurs in every different creature's mind, and you know for sure what they do not know...maryj315 said:My only problem with some peoples argument is if you have to be taught then that does not define being human
Ok good point but it is also the last point how can any other argument be made
Animals do not know of their own existence or death give me some proof other wise as far as i know we are the only animal that does and we are also the only species that goes way beyond others trying to avoid it
Except that the most recent studies seem to show that sapiens lacked the communication skills necessary to form meaningful social interactions. And while the Neanderthal lacked the imagination to form meaningful society, their brain had an area devoted to communication which was necessary to their lifestyle of tribal hunting. Taking down creatures more well armed than yourself takes a level of coordination with others that required a special type of communication ability. And it was only after neanderthals became integrated into homo sapiens that we developed out ability to communicate our abstract thoughts with any effectiveness... So we didn't necessarily 'win' per se, displacing them, but we benefitted immeasurably as a species from their being integrated into our population... It's based on some very interesting dna research...gramsci.antonio said:And this is the big leap forward that human being met: the neanderthalians had a bigger brain, but the sapiens had more capibility of abstraction, and thus (maybe) we won.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_human_behaviour