What's new

Blatent election fraud thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
imiubu

imiubu

Well-known member
h.h. said:
How sweet.

Not calling you a liar, but I’ve read your posts.
Click to expand...

Perhaps then, I strongly suggest working on your reading comprehension.

Assumptions are just that, assumptions.

Think what ya want and try to pigeon hole me to fit your narrow minded little world. It matters not to me. Shows your uninformed nature for all to view is all.

Hugs my sweet :comfort:
 
A

Amynamous

Active member
'Boogieman' said:
The lame duck is actually Joe Biden, the American people didn't even trust him enough to give him the Senate. Now he is dead on arrival.
Click to expand...

If most people voted AGAINST trump, rather than FOR Biden, then it makes perfect sense that the dems didn’t get the senate and even lost house seats.
Ya’all spent all your time thinking Biden could be presented as a negative. That’s why trump lost a long long time ago.

PS. In my opinion, Divided government is not a bad thing. Sometimes it leads to compromise between the two parties.
 
Last edited:
'Boogieman'

'Boogieman'

Well-known member
Amynamous said:
If most people voted AGAINST trump, rather than FOR Biden, then it makes perfect sense that the dems didn’t get the senate and even lost house seats.
Ya’all spent all your time thinking Biden could be presented as a negative. That’s why trump lost a long long time ago.
Click to expand...

So basically Trump's policies stay in place = I win. Trump is the best distraction we could have been given. Enjoy trying to get anything past Mitch McConnell lol.
 
Microbeman

Microbeman

The Logical Gardener
ICMag Donor
Veteran
imiubu said:
But... but... BUT... wait!!!

YouTube is not a viable news source according to you and the rest of the msn minions...

RIIIIIGHT?

Oh, only when certain folks want to utilize it to push their personal agendas does it miraculously become a useful and ever so reliable source...

RIIIIIGHT???

Can't have it both ways folks.
Either it is, or it is not.
Click to expand...

You are so smart. The youtube link claimed nothing. Just a display of stupidity both in the content and the comments below.

BTW, what have I ever once said which would class me as an MSN minion? You are so smart.
 
White Beard

White Beard

Active member
therevverend said:
https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-54874120

https://www.thedailybeast.com/tucke...ld-georgia-voter-agnes-blalock-was-a-dead-man

What's amusing about this nonsense is that the people in charge of election oversight in Georgia, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Michigan are almost all Republicans. Since Republicans control the state legislature they're the ones in charge of the elections. You've got Republicans throwing their fellow Republicans under the bus because they're so desperate to maintain their false narrative. Like this poor son of a bitch.

https://www.startribune.com/attack-on-georgia-s-secretary-of-state-marked-a-new-low/573060061/

I wouldn't recommend donating to Trump's election defense, especially if you're donating under $8000. Since Trump and the RNC is keeping the money for themselves.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...nse-instead-go-to-president-rnc-idUSKBN27R309

Trump has spent his life throwing lawyers at his perceived and real problems. It's one of the ways rich people are allowed to operate above the law. Whenever he built a casino or developed one of his properties instead of paying the contractor he'd take them to court instead of paying them. Accuse them of breach of contract. Most of the time he'd win simply because the contractors wouldn't have the $ to fight that. I guess if you're a fan of donny you think this is 'smart business'. It makes me want to puke.
Click to expand...
So much truth here: Chucker’s apology to Mrs. Blalock was entirely deserved, but he earns no respect for having to correct the record of his remarks one time.

And yes, the election officials being accused of bad election management are (almost?) entirely Republicans. Most ridiculous / extreme example being GA SOS Raffensperger - whose resignation for ‘malfeasance’ was demanded by the two Georgia GOP senators facing runoffs. Raffensperger responded as graciously as an insulted Georgia Republican can, and in fact did NOT curse at them on-camera while waving a two-bird salute, but his frost carried the message: he will not resign, he managed a fair and proper and transparent process, thankyouverymuch.

And yes, it is true that the fine print does indeed say that money donated to “DEFEND THE ELECTION” will be applied “in part” to cover the debts accrued by Trump’s ‘self-funded’ campaign.

And also yes, Rump does in fact have a documented history of abusive malicious punitive misuse of lawsuits and the courts to evade accountability for his own lapses, his own failures, his own refusal to stand up and play fair and square.

imiubu said:
But... but... BUT... wait!!!

YouTube is not a viable news source according to you and the rest of the msn minions...

RIIIIIGHT?

Oh, only when certain folks want to utilize it to push their personal agendas does it miraculously become a useful and ever so reliable source...

RIIIIIGHT???

Can't have it both ways folks.
Either it is, or it is not.
Click to expand...

Dude, I’ve kept up with your postings, too - and because of that I’m genuinely kind of shocked that you would need this explained to you. Unfortunately I guess you do need it: FOX NEWS WAS THE SOURCE, and the infamous Lou Dobbs was the yammerhead on camera. AFAICT the clip was unedited and unmonkeyed-with...which makes it more a record of an event (the broadcast, as presented), the source of any distortion or misinformation in it is on FOX. The fact that the clip was uploaded to and viewed on YouTube doesn’t enter into it. And, you have noticed, I’m sure, that You Tube doesn’t CREATE the material that makes YouTube channels suspect: it’s the *channels* - and the poo-flinging chimps who inhabit so many of them.

Anonymous ranters, hotheads, and deliberate twisters of facts, words, and opinions, who *use* YT to pretend they’re, y’know, *NEWS*, and respectable, are a different matter entirely. Self-proclaimed “experts” on the 2nd amendment, on fluoridation, on the truth of 9/11, the whereabouts of Elvis, the luxurious post-death life of Epstein, the sainthood of Gingrich, the rule of the Lizard people, the alien Antarctic civilization, the “FACTS” about things and people they don’t even know and haven’t *actually* studied...the fake-documentary sales pitches...ad infinitum, ad absurdum....

I can only HOPE you can tell the differences and actually distinguish between them, and can understand the difference between *agreeing* with what AnonymousGuy1776 - or Russia Today - has to say, and presenting it as worth listening to...and presenting AG1776 - or RT - *to others* as * authoritative sources * of truth AND FACT...and both justification of and validation for entirely DEBATABLE opinions and issues - and pretending one’s ‘point’ is thereby “proven sound and reliable”.

Honestly, if you can’t distinguish between the public record, distortions of the public record, and between the use and misuse of any platform...that slots you in with the unreliable narrators: and they are the danger.
 
imiubu

imiubu

Well-known member
Microbeman said:
You are so smart. The youtube link claimed nothing. Just a display of stupidity both in the content and the comments below.

BTW, what have I ever once said which would class me as an MSN minion? You are so smart.
Click to expand...


Dude! Stop giving away my ultra secret super powers!

Opinions are like a holes... :dancer:
 
A

Amynamous

Active member
'Boogieman' said:
So basically Trump's policies stay in place = I win. Trump is the best distraction we could have been given. Enjoy trying to get anything past Mitch McConnell lol.
Click to expand...

Aside from the taxcut giveaway, what other legislative accomplishments would you like to see preserved?
 
imiubu

imiubu

Well-known member
Dude!
The fact that you actually think I need you to explain anything to me sums up my points quite succinctly.

That I need to explain that to you... well, this also makes my point again and poignantly at that.

The way you folks come a runnin' to defend each other is just adorable. As if no one has the ability to discuss or defend themselves. smh.

Hey there mustard dude... how'm I doin' wit dem big ole words? U keeping up? Hope so.
 
'Boogieman'

'Boogieman'

Well-known member
Amynamous said:
Aside from the taxcut giveaway, what other legislative accomplishments would you like to see preserved?
Click to expand...

Tax cuts are big, anyone who campaigns on that will get my vote. I don't have to pay a fine for Obamacare. I'm happy with 3 pro 2A Supreme Court Justices. And most importantly the left never got their way on anything. Let's not forget the space force :dance013:.
 
White Beard

White Beard

Active member
imiubu said:
Dude!
The fact that you actually think I need you to explain anything to me sums up my points quite succinctly.

That I need to explain that to you... well, this also makes my point again and poignantly at that.

The way you folks come a runnin' to defend each other is just adorable. As if no one has the ability to discuss or defend themselves. smh.

Hey there mustard dude... how'm I doin' wit dem big ole words? U keeping up? Hope so.
Click to expand...

And *you* have made clear that - while you might not be a “Trump supporter”, you’ve adopted enough of their trolling tactics and logical lapses to take you out of the conversation for me. Too bad: I’ll miss the voice you used to bring to the discussions, you were valuable.
 
imiubu

imiubu

Well-known member
White Beard said:
And *you* have made clear that - while you might not be a “Trump supporter”, you’ve adopted enough of their trolling tactics and logical lapses to take you out of the conversation for me. Too bad: I’ll miss the voice you used to bring to the discussions, you were valuable.
Click to expand...

Are you trying to convey that you do not like your sanctimonious hypocrisy tossed back atcha?

Here is a beautiful concept... pay close attention now... attempts to devalue my opinions or to diminish my character to fit your narrative, is that in which matters not to me.

Being confident in my abilities to discern facts from utter bs leaves me not in need of another persons approval ratings. Esp. some self proclaimed 'I am always RIGHT! Listen to MEEEE dammit!' individuals.

I can give it back just as well as it's dished out.
Is that a problem mr. beard hairs?
I am not a 12 yo. you're endeavoring to bully.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top