fair enough. so what does this mean to us as individuals?
YES! what you say SEEMS to be true for me.
except for the sense of smell (which I have been told by credible authorities) is hard wired to the reptile part of our brain. so the experience of smell is IMMEDIATE. (this is why it can be so evocative.)
However, how we explain or interpret what we have smelled is ... like you say.
by the way: Assumptions make an ASS [out of] U [and] ME.
It is still secondary since it goes through the brain. This is an indirect perception. This is what I'm calling interpretation. The second part which is meaning is based on beliefs and assumptions. And the last part which is the emotional charge (fear, anger, pleasure, etc.) is created by us in order to know how to act in relation to whatever we perceive in our moment to moment experiences.
No. I think I 'm saying opposite to you.
we can't 'create' emotions unless we think first about the experience that caused them.
the body automatically creates emotions as responses to environmental factors. this is what Psychology calls 'somatic response'.
how we behave in response to those emotions is due to the way we think about how we are feeling.
altho feelings are originally discrete and immediate, thinking can recall feelings ... and we can feel what we did in the first place all over again, and again, and again ... like a ptsd sufferer can ... or like someone who wallows in memories can ... but first we have to be thinking about the original experience.
anyway, my motto is ... watch where you're goin not where you been!
and: it is the compulsion of Man to categorise and make inventories (Carlos Castaneda said that).
If you can stop thinking for a moment (or few) and just be aware of everything (everything that happens inside and outside: silence, sounds, your thoughts, feelings, memories...=EVERYTHING) and not react to that, something new happens. Something that becomes greater than anything you've experienced before, better and more important than ANY experience you've had. Even better than LSD, mushrooms, sex, wealth, love...you name it. That cannot be explained with thoughts and speech, but once realized it absorbs everything else. The more you stay silent and without thinking but still fully awake and aware the more you will see of that.
I see the problem with your rave Mr South Florida to be ... that you seem not to experience feelings immediately.
and this lack of connection with your body ... this lack of immediacy ... affects your view of existence.
I say the body generates feelings before the brain gets into the act. for example, you turn round and there's a bus doing 60 miles an hour about to hit you. the body will generate a feeling called FEAR and the body will react and jump out of the way. during that short time there will have been NO thoughts ... no filtering and translating of experience into word play.
and the other problem with your proposition is the term 'reality'. you speak of reality as if it's a thing or object.
well, it's not. it's a notion ... or to use a post-modernist term ... a REIFICATION. that is: something that is 'real' only when we think of it. like 'divorce', or 'true love', or 'freedom' or 'democracy'.
those things are all fancies that are meaningless when the shit is hitting the fan.
so I reckon, until you learn which are feelings ... and which are thinkings ... you need to desist from ramming idiosyncratic logic down our metaphysical throats.
however, I 'd still be happy to share a joint with you. cheers, Sir!
to stop thinking is possible, but not an easy thing to accomplish because our perceptions have one goal, and one goal only: SURVIVAL
so, our self-mind will not co-operate in stopping the thinking process, since the self-mind is producing it with a purpose of helping our conceptual "self" (this includes the physical body) to survive
it is a step-by-step process and does take some contemplation in order to arrive at a point where all the thinking stops
since we ARE Consciousness/Being and our conceptual "self" is simply a distinction inside of Consciousness/Being...we can STOP making the distinction of our conceptual "self."
but, this is unlikely.
Most folks will want to continue to exist and continue to experience some aspects of their conceptual "self."
because if one eliminates the distinction "self" completely - the entity that we believe and assume that we ARE - will vanish.
That probably holds true for the majority of human population, BUT if you take a better look at our present situation, you will see that: we already have enough to eat, so why does LIFE = SURVIVAL, still ? Isn't that the thing of the past? Take this moment NOW. You have enough food to allow yourself to stop thinking for a few hours every day. So the problem is not in the external world, but in human EGO that hasn't adapted yet to the 'new' possibilities of the Self growth. Our egos still live in the long gone world of competition/survival, which at this moment in time, only exists in our minds.
Yes, usually it's not easy, but it becomes easier as you work on it, like with any other thing in life. Thus it's called 'WORK on one's self'
The thing is that this new self is infinitely greater than the old conceptual self. Only a mad man would miss/deny opportunity for infinite evolution.
Great thread, tho you clearly have more faith in the cognitive prowess of the average person than I...
Typically, this information is "devils work"..
I agree btw, just dont understand why you are appealing to the masses, only NT's understand this, from my experience...