Ok... one more time.
If you are presenting actual evidence, I have never called you a denialist.
since I have already looked into your questions, and found a place that has gone to all the trouble to compile all the known arguments, present the data, and follow it up with an open discussion by all sides where it is openly debated, where you can find the data to answer your questions and more... I am guilty of nothing resembling oppressionism.
I only am calling people denialists whose entire argument rests on rhetorical tactics.
I have stated over and over and over from the begining,
Skepticism is integral to science.
Skeptics are willing to consider evidence and not just hide behind rhetoric.
I gave you mountains of evidence to consider.
If you find something not addressed in detail already in the information I pointed out, I'll happily consider it as well.
I started out as a staunch climate skeptic, but the more I studied into it, the more undeniable AGW has become, and I am now damn near convinced. I wish it wasn't so, but I refuse to stick my head in the sand, or restrict myself to only look at the tiny portion of the available data which I could use to pretend AGW might not be happening.
I always have the tendency to want to believe the conspiracy theories, but digging deeper generally makes it impossible for me to fool myself into doing so.
Once more...
Skepticism is integral to science.
I have the utmost respect for open minded truth seeking skeptics... after all I am one.
If you are presenting actual evidence, I have never called you a denialist.
since I have already looked into your questions, and found a place that has gone to all the trouble to compile all the known arguments, present the data, and follow it up with an open discussion by all sides where it is openly debated, where you can find the data to answer your questions and more... I am guilty of nothing resembling oppressionism.
I only am calling people denialists whose entire argument rests on rhetorical tactics.
I have stated over and over and over from the begining,
Skepticism is integral to science.
Skeptics are willing to consider evidence and not just hide behind rhetoric.
I gave you mountains of evidence to consider.
If you find something not addressed in detail already in the information I pointed out, I'll happily consider it as well.
I started out as a staunch climate skeptic, but the more I studied into it, the more undeniable AGW has become, and I am now damn near convinced. I wish it wasn't so, but I refuse to stick my head in the sand, or restrict myself to only look at the tiny portion of the available data which I could use to pretend AGW might not be happening.
I always have the tendency to want to believe the conspiracy theories, but digging deeper generally makes it impossible for me to fool myself into doing so.
Once more...
Skepticism is integral to science.
I have the utmost respect for open minded truth seeking skeptics... after all I am one.