"by doing this the odds are more stacked against you. well that and time aswell."
URUK,
I'm talking about a multi-pronged attack to turn around what we have now instead of this one sided argument that I simply do not agree with, an alternative approach if you will.
Nvisionary keeps comparing OP polyhybrids to what we have a great deal of now (polysoup, lol, that was good) and stating that nobody will know the difference, but he continues to avoid comparing what we have now to what we could have now with just a bit more effort.
A) Take any polyhybrid on the market today, open pollinate no less than 100 plants (save the best females), store the seed except 1000 - Nvisionary is somewhat appeased I would hope.
B) Then grow out these 1000 held back from storage, set aside the best 10-20 individuals and intensively inbreed for a couple of generations - I would self them. Discard the less desirable families and open pollinate what's left, or use them for F1 seed, etc.
We would have accomplished both what Nvisionary is insisting is best for the future of cannabis -leave room for future improvements in (A), as well as done some actual improvements in (B), and I'm sure the market would approve of (B) like X100 what he's suggesting, lol. I think this type of multi-approach would be far better for cannabis and not particularly farther-fetched than what he is laying down.
Can I come forward, and speak out against my peers who didn't jump on board and agree? No, some of these guys ARE already in possession of prepotent breeding stock that does not require massive numbers in selection imo, and also because nobody can honestly say with certainty that their efforts will not contribute beneficial inputs to the future of cannabis, imo. -T
URUK,
I'm talking about a multi-pronged attack to turn around what we have now instead of this one sided argument that I simply do not agree with, an alternative approach if you will.
Nvisionary keeps comparing OP polyhybrids to what we have a great deal of now (polysoup, lol, that was good) and stating that nobody will know the difference, but he continues to avoid comparing what we have now to what we could have now with just a bit more effort.
A) Take any polyhybrid on the market today, open pollinate no less than 100 plants (save the best females), store the seed except 1000 - Nvisionary is somewhat appeased I would hope.
B) Then grow out these 1000 held back from storage, set aside the best 10-20 individuals and intensively inbreed for a couple of generations - I would self them. Discard the less desirable families and open pollinate what's left, or use them for F1 seed, etc.
We would have accomplished both what Nvisionary is insisting is best for the future of cannabis -leave room for future improvements in (A), as well as done some actual improvements in (B), and I'm sure the market would approve of (B) like X100 what he's suggesting, lol. I think this type of multi-approach would be far better for cannabis and not particularly farther-fetched than what he is laying down.
Can I come forward, and speak out against my peers who didn't jump on board and agree? No, some of these guys ARE already in possession of prepotent breeding stock that does not require massive numbers in selection imo, and also because nobody can honestly say with certainty that their efforts will not contribute beneficial inputs to the future of cannabis, imo. -T