What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

Trump implies that he might legalize cannabis.

gaiusmarius

gaiusmarius

me
Veteran
what is that box thing on Clintons back?

BTW. all this personal bickering is just plain boring. i want to see witty posts about issues, not people, ideas, not insults. else whats the point of these threads? anyone can call someone a moron or their opinion moronic. but most are not able to articulate exactly what makes it moronic, what exactly is a better solution and so on.
 
I

igrowone

Well-known member
Veteran
time for more fuel to the fire
some may have noticed the release of the 'trump' transcripts, meetings on kicking hillary's ass
which did work out
but interestingly there's frustration at that time that they weren't finding hillary dirt, at least not any new dirt
i call that damning evidence in reverse
as little as i cared for clinton, the real outlaw won in the same way he's lived his life
 
M

moose eater

igrowone said:
time for more fuel to the fire
some may have noticed the release of the 'trump' transcripts, meetings on kicking hillary's ass
which did work out
but interestingly there's frustration at that time that they weren't finding hillary dirt, at least not any new dirt
i call that damning evidence in reverse
as little as i cared for clinton, the real outlaw won in the same way he's lived his life
Click to expand...

For all the verifiable shenanigans the DNC was involved in during the primaries and after, they were very careful not to have HRC's fingerprints on any of it directly.

Is that surprising?

However, the Wiki-Leaks Docs did, in fact, show that she was not honest about a number of serious matters. Including leaks that predated her run for the Oval Office by a number of years.

Those leaks are still available for viewing, I believe. There's some good reading in there, including her record behind the scenes as Sec. of State.

Illegal Russian arms shipments to Africa that she and the State Dept knew about, yet never threw the proverbial penalty flag on the playing field, and more.

"There is not one clean; nay not one."
 
Zeez

Zeez

---------------->
ICMag Donor
Well,,,, The illegal arms shipments to Africa.... You don't think that the arab spring was just some coincidence that we had nothing to do with...... Those are the best deals ever when they pull off something like that on the down low. Of course they wanted that one quiet. And, you know they're not handing out M16s.
 
I

igrowone

Well-known member
Veteran
moose eater said:
...

However, the Wiki-Leaks Docs did, in fact, show that she was not honest about a number of serious matters. Including leaks that predated her run for the Oval Office by a number of years.

...
Click to expand...

no doubt of that, just the usual old time level of republic dirty deeds
it's the other accusations/rhetoric that went way over the top
some of it nonsensical
which is par for the current dialog
 
M

moose eater

The most interesting to me at the time, included the leaks that showed her claims to have severed her ties re. administering the Clinton Foundation during her stint as Sec of State were BS, during the time frame when the foreign entities who received arms deals, also happened to make HUGE donations to the Clinton Foundation.

I scratch my head though, wondering how this stuff slides to the side so easily, though I know there was not a 'smoking gun,' that we know of, showing the necessary "You do this for me, and I'll do that for you" spelled out that would be required for a conviction for bribery, pay to play, etc.

But circumstantially speaking, the writing is all over the walls on those instances.

And the percentage the Foundation ran in overhead/admin costs, versus what actually went to their 'non-profit mission.' Chelsea did pretty well for herself, for a grad straight out of school.
 
M

moose eater

igrowone said:
no doubt of that, just the usual old time level of republic dirty deeds
it's the other accusations/rhetoric that went way over the top
some of it nonsensical
which is par for the current dialog
Click to expand...

Yep. The FB stories about Pizza-gate, etc., were taken in willingly by folks who wanted to hate, and lacked the motivation to research their ammo.

But when someone's as ego-driven, power-crazed, self-serving, etc., as some of the folks were discussing have been, many find it easy to take in allegations without question, even when those allegations go way over the top.
 
Zeez

Zeez

---------------->
ICMag Donor
Julian Assange, WikiLeaks, strategically released the e-mails whenever Clinton's lead expanded in the polls. After the Democratic Party, along with cybersecurity experts, claimed that Russian intelligence had hacked Clinton campaign-related e-mails and leaked them to WikiLeaks.

I think that many of the emails released were fabricated AKA Collusion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Assange
 
M

moose eater

The reports I read stated the feds had authenticated the leaks.

There's been in-fighting at Wiki-Leaks after several high-profile visits to Assange & suspicions of the Org having been undermined., but I believe that Assange never colluded with anyone.

His group releases what ever -verified- and 'valuable' tidbits come their way.

I believe the Powers that Be are invested in silencing such sources, and have forever been skilled at inciting distrust into organizations they deem to be a threat, leading to such internal distrust. it was their MO with the Panthers, Weathermen, Communist Socialist Workers Party, the Klan, Malcolm, MLK, and more. It's what they do. .

I believe, from my reading, that Assange was set up in the 1st place re. the allegations of sexual assault (and there were postings by at least one of the 2 alleged victims to add weight to this), that Clinton and others wanted him silenced before she ever ran for Prez., and that Wiki-Leaks, as a clearing house, was very responsible in not releasing things that weren't verified by code in files.

As I wrote before, even the feds authenticated the leaks, to include the DNC leaks..

Edit: If someone timed files sent to Wiki-Leaks to coincide with any surges by Clinton, that would be on the motivation of the sender, not on Wiki-Leaks.

And from Donna Brazille's accounts, as well as first-hand knowledge of the 'collusion' and undermining during the primaries between the DNC and State Dem Party groups, I can assure you that dirty pool was played. Anchorage's caucusing was rife with it. A proverbial 'Come to Jesus' meeting was held in Anchorage not too long ago, where things such as money laundering for the DNC during the primaries were discussed.
 
Zeez

Zeez

---------------->
ICMag Donor
I think that Assange was the tool and Russians were the source. Guilty pleas and agreements to testify already made will possibly verify when made public. The trump campaign had knowledge of these releases before hand and admitted publicly.
 
vta

vta

Active member
Veteran
Trump Says He “Really” Supports Senate Marijuana Legislation



President Trump said on Friday that he “really” supports new marijuana legislation filed by Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Cory Gardner (R-CO).

“I really do. I support Senator Gardner,” he said when a reporter asked whether he backs the bill.

“I know exactly what he’s doing. We’re looking at it,” Trump said during an impromptu press conference on the White House lawn as he prepared to board Marine One to head to G-7 summit in Canada. “But I probably will end up supporting that, yes.”

11:35 mark...

[YOUTUBEIF]UlSz1QENfZw[/YOUTUBEIF]
 
B

Badfishy1

Active member
Zeez said:
I think that Assange was the tool and Russians were the source. Guilty pleas and agreements to testify already made will possibly verify when made public. The trump campaign had knowledge of these releases before hand and admitted publicly.
Click to expand...

‘Russians were the source’. Unless Seth Rich was Russian I don’t believe the ‘Russians’ were the source. It has pretty well been verified (not explicitly in such words), but SR -> KDC (through mega upload) -> Wikileaks was the route in which the supposed ‘hacking’ took place. IF and I personally don’t think there is a chance in hell, DNC server was hacked, why wasn’t FBI allowed to go through meta and find the source of the ‘hack’? Nothing to hide if everything is on the up and up right? Even the Guccifer 2.0 ‘hack’ has more holes than Swiss cheese if one wants to research it more, the info is available
 
I

igrowone

Well-known member
Veteran
checking through the new 'legal' legislation
it's basically taking the federal out of cannabis enforcement
but it's not federal legalization, up to each state
and i don't see big changes coming down south and midwest
real close to prohibition #1, some go legal, some hang on to the past
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top