It was your statement that I quoted and responded too.
Good thing it wasn't a book requiring a complete quote not to be 'weak'.
Disagreeing is not weakness. Don't expect everyone to agree with you.
In the current events, and this thread, trump is the one who is out there disagreeing with our entire intelligence community about Russia, Iran, the wall emergency, and pretty much everything. Your statement is inline with trump. This sentiment of disagreeing and discrediting the American intelligence community is a recurring theme in the pro-trump camp here. Being anti FBI, NSA etc is trumps line to deny those prosecuting him and those around him.
As for the methodology of spooks, it must be looked on as a military type of operation. If situations are beyond diplomacy then stuff happens that is short of a full military operation but rougher than Mr Rogers neighborhood.
î am happy to be disagreed with on issues i actually believe in. but when someone says you must be a hard core trump supporter, because i have no faith in the so called intelligence agencies its funny as hell.
what i find weak, is quoting only a small part of my post, there by removing part of the context it was posted in, then proceed to tell me what i must be, based on your fantasy. it annoys me to be accused of something i didnt say. it's a weak rhetorical trick to take something out of it's context and subscribe meaning to it that was never part of it and not 1 posts later i add more context, which again you chose to ignore and pretend not to see or understand i guess.
when you quote and respond with only a partial quote, it looks shady. why cut off the rest of the context? respond how ever you like, but this business with pretending 1 sentence of my post was the whole of it is dishonest imo.
i'd never do that to anyone. i might break their post up to add my replies between paragraphs, but i'd never leave out parts of what someone says to respond to them.
why not just press quote and add your reply at the bottom? why would you go in and delete parts of it? thats the part i find strange.