Rusty Trichome
Member
Too many missing facts, from too many sources with conflicting ideological and spiritual dogma's. Not ruled-out, just not enough evidence for a 1+1=2 formula.Interesting epistemological approach:
You don't trust empirical methodology because of possible data errors -- induction is ruled out.
No...I don't trust reasoning from those that call themselves "scientists" yet they expect us to "trust them" with their incomplete timelines, make-believe storylines, and that we don't need to question their scientific, wild-ass guesswork.You don't trust reasoning a priori via logic for an unknown reason -- deduction is ruled out.
I deduce that there is more to the story than some chipmonk being bashed for making us actually THINK about possibilities that might or might not help to explain where the fuck guy's like you come from. <sorry...couldn't resist>
Do I think ET came down and knocked-up a Neanderthal hooker...? Likely not. Do I believe that Allah rose to the heavens at Mecca Rock? (or whatever that rock's name is) Likely not. Do I think we have been visited by aliens? Possibly. Do I think we are related to the aliens? Possibly. Do I think the aliens are from the future, and are us in the first place? Perhaps. Do I think the Lakers will win the Champoinship next year? Bet your sweet ass I do. (unless locked-out, of course) :thumbsup:
See...that's the problem. You don't know, yet you find my views...what...tangental to established fact? Establish a fact, and we'll discuss it as such.Uhm, that's leaves you with "stuff I just kinda feel is right because I don't know why."
Yup. Way easier to bash something you don't understand, rather than see it from any other perspective and perhaps gain yourself some insight. But in my book, a closed mind is terrible thing to use as a crutch.Which seems to become, therefore: