RegisPhilburn1
Member
I think we could get around the need for dry ice. Considering that we are working with a REFRIGERANT I think that we could employ that to our benefit.
Just think of what happens when you recover with no heat on the bottom, and pour, like rbe's method. The waxes fall out of solution do the chilling effect of evaporating butane coupled with the increasing solute concentration, and decreasing solvent amount. The waxes fall out first. Now think if we could watch that with a viewport and when we want to filter, (valve off recovery pump) we pull it through a series of filters (like sweet leaf' ball valve in between, but no sight glass) into another chamber that had a vacuum pulled on it, then we could open the recovery pump to that chamber and recover the remainder of our solvent. And have caught all the waxes in the filters above.
It would be significantly faster than passive, and wouldn't require expensive (and too cold in my opinion) dry ice. I have observed temps at about -20 to -30f on my bottom spool when recovery with no heat, which is about the temps I'd like to hit with dewaxing.
Height would certainly be an issue. A stand would help.
For the" don't extract them in the first place" method, I do something similar to dopecook, I wrap my tube with a couple of these ice sheetfreeze my tubes overnight down to -10f and then remove the ice sheets for recovery. The tube stays at about -5f the whole time. I have worked in a few different places where dry ice wasn't available, so this is what I did instead.
I think both strategies are important, and should be used together.
Just think of what happens when you recover with no heat on the bottom, and pour, like rbe's method. The waxes fall out of solution do the chilling effect of evaporating butane coupled with the increasing solute concentration, and decreasing solvent amount. The waxes fall out first. Now think if we could watch that with a viewport and when we want to filter, (valve off recovery pump) we pull it through a series of filters (like sweet leaf' ball valve in between, but no sight glass) into another chamber that had a vacuum pulled on it, then we could open the recovery pump to that chamber and recover the remainder of our solvent. And have caught all the waxes in the filters above.
It would be significantly faster than passive, and wouldn't require expensive (and too cold in my opinion) dry ice. I have observed temps at about -20 to -30f on my bottom spool when recovery with no heat, which is about the temps I'd like to hit with dewaxing.
Height would certainly be an issue. A stand would help.
For the" don't extract them in the first place" method, I do something similar to dopecook, I wrap my tube with a couple of these ice sheetfreeze my tubes overnight down to -10f and then remove the ice sheets for recovery. The tube stays at about -5f the whole time. I have worked in a few different places where dry ice wasn't available, so this is what I did instead.
I think both strategies are important, and should be used together.
Last edited: