Thanks for stopping by guys
denmaster.. I'm using 63w led panels in the ngb cabinet. I barely flowered under them, I did one kinda "tester" plant and I wasn't quite happy with the yield, great quality and decent yield, but I have some hids running anyways now so no need to flower under the leds. I highly recommend them for a small set up with a little extra cfls to supplement if you're going to flower, but for veg..for vegging they are awesome!..nice tight internodes and the plants grow superfast! For an example I vegged a coco plant under one of the 63w panels..it only used up about 1/4 of the light/space..I fimmed the crap out of it and got 5+ oz. Granted it was flowered under a 1k hps, but I think for a 1 month veg under about 15watts of led, to yield 5zips is pretty damn good!
I plan on buying some larger led panels eventually to veg with when I get a little more room. I'd actually prefer to veg under the led panels vs a 400w cmh...but that's just my opinion, ppl will think that's dumb...but really I don't need much penetration or high wattage in veg..my 200watts in my ngb cab for veg keeps the 2000watt room fully stocked with veg plants now starting to get backed up...and I'm all about saving energy costs...and leds save alot of energy, and you don't have to F around with any crazy venting or big, hot, heavy ass ballasts..
so 2 thumbs up for veg no matter what size your set up. and 2 thumbs up to flower under if you add a little more supplemental cfls or use a higher watts per sq foot then I did. Keep in mind too I only did that one little tester plant really, Verdantgreen has great results flowering under them and you might want to check out his grows and opinions on them before listening to any of my bs
edit: oh and vs hps I'd say maybe watt for watt they're comparable if you utilize the footprint properly...but not like how the companies claim that like a 200w panel = a 400w hps. I would say htough that I think my 63w panels = 120w of cfl in veg and =80 watts of hid in flower..if that makes any sense.
denmaster.. I'm using 63w led panels in the ngb cabinet. I barely flowered under them, I did one kinda "tester" plant and I wasn't quite happy with the yield, great quality and decent yield, but I have some hids running anyways now so no need to flower under the leds. I highly recommend them for a small set up with a little extra cfls to supplement if you're going to flower, but for veg..for vegging they are awesome!..nice tight internodes and the plants grow superfast! For an example I vegged a coco plant under one of the 63w panels..it only used up about 1/4 of the light/space..I fimmed the crap out of it and got 5+ oz. Granted it was flowered under a 1k hps, but I think for a 1 month veg under about 15watts of led, to yield 5zips is pretty damn good!
I plan on buying some larger led panels eventually to veg with when I get a little more room. I'd actually prefer to veg under the led panels vs a 400w cmh...but that's just my opinion, ppl will think that's dumb...but really I don't need much penetration or high wattage in veg..my 200watts in my ngb cab for veg keeps the 2000watt room fully stocked with veg plants now starting to get backed up...and I'm all about saving energy costs...and leds save alot of energy, and you don't have to F around with any crazy venting or big, hot, heavy ass ballasts..
so 2 thumbs up for veg no matter what size your set up. and 2 thumbs up to flower under if you add a little more supplemental cfls or use a higher watts per sq foot then I did. Keep in mind too I only did that one little tester plant really, Verdantgreen has great results flowering under them and you might want to check out his grows and opinions on them before listening to any of my bs
edit: oh and vs hps I'd say maybe watt for watt they're comparable if you utilize the footprint properly...but not like how the companies claim that like a 200w panel = a 400w hps. I would say htough that I think my 63w panels = 120w of cfl in veg and =80 watts of hid in flower..if that makes any sense.