This is my understanding from the video. According to the lawyer, most states forbid "binding" delegates to vote for someone against their choosing.Now from the above video I am getting the understanding that there are NO BOUND DELEGATES..All are free to vote for who they choose once in Tampa..am I understanding correctly? I Believe that is a huge jump for Dr. Ron Paul..Huge add to his momentum..YES? Thank you in advance! monkey5
Okay..maybe I miss understood ..I was thinking that we (Paul's people), were wondering how things were going because ~Bound~ delegates HAD to vote for Romney during the first round of voting..THEREFORE..the 2nd round would free them to vote for Dr. Ron Paul? Is that correct? Now from the above video I am getting the understanding that there are NO BOUND DELEGATES..All are free to vote for who they choose once in Tampa..am I understanding correctly? I Believe that is a huge jump for Dr. Ron Paul..Huge add to his momentum..YES? Thank you in advance! monkey5
Ron Paul Restoring Democracy = Inserting Ringers.
-
Politics is a game, this is/could be an effective way to play the game, but all the RonPauliacs seem to claim to be 'above it all', when the only way the WILL EVER WIN is to con/game/exploit the loopholes themselves.
some people amaze me. what do you get from trolling this thread with your fucking derogatory comparisons of Dr. Ron Paul and his supporters to communists and nazi's.
you are a truly sad excuse for a human.
Oh i understand much better than his supporters, im just willing to admit it.You don't really learn or process new information well, do you? You've used this tired old argument multiple times.
There is a reason Ron Paul supporters are angry and look for loopholes in the rules. (we are not breaking them, just to be clear)
Oh i understand much better than his supporters, im just willing to admit it.
He is at best 'subversive for everyone's eventual benefit' Its a hell of a wagon to hook yourselves to.
The National Socialist and the Communist were NO DOUBT the two most influential political parties of the 20th century. Its an absolute shame you cannot divorce there overall polices from their polices for gaining political power. Youlll never learn from history, if the subject is so taboo you cannot evaluate it.
-
Oh i understand much better than his supporters, im just willing to admit it.
He is at best 'subversive for everyone's eventual benefit' Its a hell of a wagon to hook yourselves to.
The National Socialist and the Communist were NO DOUBT the two most influential political parties of the 20th century. Its an absolute shame you cannot divorce there overall polices from their polices for gaining political power. Youlll never learn from history, if the subject is so taboo you cannot evaluate it.
-
You don't Know history wrth a shit...
Remember, after hitler was appointed chancellor by Hindenburg under urgeings from influential politicians and major German industrialists, the reichstag burnt down(a perfectly timed false flag) resulting in president Hindenburg, under urgings from hitler, allowing detention of citizens without trial(among other thing) through what was called the reichstag fire decree.
After the reichstag was rebuilt hitler brought the enabling act to vote, which gave his cabinet full control of legislation in Germany. He needed two thirds majority so he used provisions of the reichstag fire decree to keep his opponents out.
That is not even close to what Dr. Paul and his supporters are doing. Suggesting what you are suggesting far off base...