DO you honestly think that simply because someone describes themselves as a Republican, that they don't have the mental capacity to think about things? Or at least not with the super critical way of thinking and analysis that you apply to things?sandawg said:
Politicians will always use divisive issues, especially controversial ones for political gain. Unfortunately, mj/mmj is unique in that there's not enough active grass roots support for non-conservatives to go after it. But it's still there for conservatives to exploit. Of the active Republican prohibitionist/reform opponents we see in news, practically nobody knows them on a national level. It brings attention as it gets news in national publications. This helps to raise money for PACs and elections. I know, Jesse Helms used to be my senator and he sought every issue possible to exploit and gain national appeal. Conservatives nationwide knew Helms was a bastion of old school conservatism but never howled that Helms wasn't active in things like repealing Roe v Wade or lowering taxes when at the time, the highest rate was 80% and higher. It was all stump to win a national name, capable of winning contributions on a national level.
You're making up you're own crap, boy. And you're a divider, not a uniter. Stereotypical prejudices run through your veins like ice water. Why don't you take on the drive by, one liners? They're more your speed. You just waste everybody else's time.You ignore the book and argue the preface.
As evident you will tap keys even when you don't know what the fuck you're talking about, ad infinitum. These "very satisfied" voters released a recall petition for their councilman that voted against carbon reductions in the so-called "most beautiful part of the nation." He's also fucked in a fund misappropriation scandal. The only thing satisfied here is your 30 second google investigation.
You can support these reform opponents all you want and nobody else gives a fuck. We can just all sit back and watch you singlehandedly justify the OP. Ignoring the fact that "no demand" is a stupid argument only shows you ignore active reform in the wrong direction. You even give them the benefit of the doubt while you ignore the facts and get personal with the op.
Nah, you're the troll. Total distraction. You don't give a fuck about this thread except to knock it off the tracks. No different than every other opinionated thread. A total and complete waste of attention.
The mental capacity to sympathize with the prohibition side of this issue.
Well go on with your bad self, symapthizer.
Does that mean you're capable being a racist, when the time serves you? I don't care what your prejudices are. What I care is you're thrill of showing your crack on a regular basis.
I want in on that one and you're gonna lose.
More prejudice, Arch?
I sure hope they don't have to see the side of you IC does. I get the feeling you're more digestible in the real world and save your game on the keyboard.
Kentucky is a conservative state, but they sure don't mind redistributing the wealth to themselves, eh?
Ba Ba Ba Beck.
Unfortunately, diddy will only get the details in the sub-links and doesn't have that long an attention span. In the event he musters enough cardio to read, he'll just toss one of those cracked pigeons that isn't worth aiming at.
