Neither is more important...it's just understanding what language you're using when talking PPM's. icough2getoff basically explained it...it's like talking English and Spanish in the same sentence...no biggie really. PPM readings are based on a conversion (arbitrary) from EC.mrcheezy503 said:i gather it means ec is much more important than ppm? but i thought somehow ppm and ec were always on a constant scale together so wouldn't one be the other?
Agreed.Dude there is no way you are feeding over 4000 ppm on any CF and getting nugs of any quality.
A point of EC is a point of EC is a point of EC regardless of manufacturer. Sure the formulas will be different (nute ratios and actual macro/micro nutes in the formula).1.0ec of GH nutes isn't going to be the same as 1.0ec of AN nutes, isn't going to be the same as 1.0ec of Canna nutes.
If your EC is that high in the root zone I don't think you're feeding frequently enough. Yes an EC of 2 in the res ( I actually ran about 2200 to 2400...lol...exact same thing as 2.2 to 2.4 but using micro instead of milli siemens) is pretty normal. I would check my initial runoff from the tables and not the root zone just to be sure. The less frequent you fertigate the higher the EC in the root zone will climb. I mean what about DWC where roots are constantly in a nute solution? The EC is constant...but not when you run cycles in something like rockwool, coco or hydroton.to clarify my above post I mean that when res ppm is 1000 (or 2ec) (which is about normal for most people i think) the cubes via syringe measured 4000 (8ec).
Whatever said:A point of EC is a point of EC is a point of EC regardless of manufacturer. Sure the formulas will be different (nute ratios and actual macro/micro nutes in the formula).
No other views really...maybe just a communication thing...you can take some GH Bloom and Micro and mix up to get an EC of 1800 or you can take table salt and and mix to get 1800. Either way it's the same EC but the macro/micro profile will be different.bounty29 said:Any other views on this?
I basically agree.EC/ppm/whatever you like is only good when comparing the same nutes. 1.0ec of GH nutes isn't going to be the same as 1.0ec of AN nutes, isn't going to be the same as 1.0ec of Canna nutes.
Dont the ppms raise as the plants use up water in the evaporation process? I checked my res at day two and the ppms went from 1250 to 1350. I topped it off back to the full mark and the ppms went a lil lower then 1240. Does this sound like my plants are taking the nutes ok? They have great new growth for just two days. You can see the plants in my thread if you want.
If EC drops and pH rises, you're under feeding. You'll want to raise EC over 400 not return it to 400. Question is, how much water is being replaced? If half the water, then 450 would return us to 400 but we want more so, we top off with 500 and see where that goes.
Note that EC and pH stable may look good on paper but is bad in practice over time. No single pH reading allows equal absorption of all nutes. By maintaining a flat pH reading, you guarantee unbalanced feeding, leading to deficiencies or toxicity. You want pH to swing between 5.5-6.0. Many swing as low as 5.2. The trick is to slow the swing down to a week or two rather than every day.
If EC drops (underfeeding) and you top off with tap, you'll lower EC. If they were underfed before, they're starving now. The only way to raise EC with top off is to add a higher concentration in the add back.
Note you do not want flat readings. "Spot on" is highly subjective but, I say it's when pH swings from 5.5-6.0 over a two week period. Measure and chart EC and pH daily, note the swings, if too fast or slow, adjust feed rates accordingly until the swing happens on your preferred timetable.
If you don't read EC and pH before top off, you cannot top off correctly. Topping off is about more than adding water, it's about adjusting or maintaining EC and pH. If you don't know where these numbers are at BEFORE top off, you have no idea what to top off with.
Measure both EC and pH in the res. Determine what, if any, changes need be made. Draw new water and measure it's EC and pH. Adjust EC and pH of new water so that when added to the res, the res readings are correct. Add water, measure res again to see if desired results have been achieved.
Personally, I overfeed on purpose but, just barely. Over 2 weeks EC climbs, pH drops and straight tap water brings me back to original numbers. However, I wouldn't have known tap water would do if I had not measured EC and pH of BOTH the res and the addback before I topped off.
I don't know how to explain more simply. Measure both EC and pH in the res. Determine what, if any, changes need be made. Draw new water and measure it's EC and pH. Adjust EC and pH of new water so that when added to the res, the res readings are correct.
EC and pH should move in opposite directions. Something in your medium is messing with the natural order of things if the above scenario is in fact happening. However, because your story is changing, I don't known if the above scenario is true. First EC was dropping now it's climbing. Which is happening? What's the medium?
i have a full res at 500 ppm at ph 5.6 then i flood twice in one day. the next day it says 550 ppm with ph 5.8 before i top off. what do i do next specifically?"