I highly doubt that we are talking about gas chromatography here Rick, not that it would be any more relevant/important than our own opinions concerning quality even if we were. Once we accept 100+ possible modifying factors in terpenoids alone (see SamS, who is intimately acquainted with this science), focusing/narrowing-in that much with GC becomes barely more than moot in considering selection methods. Imo, the science of this old plant is still far too young to be placing such a high importance on anything quite yet. Dollars to donuts, I bet the folks at GW Pharmaceuticals are scratching their heads and feeling right about now somewhat like the Saudi's did after we sold them all those fighter jets but failed to include the operating/repair manuals. Teehee -Tom
hay Tom,,,,,
i was only joking about that dude having a GC,,,,i dont expect him to be like sam,,,who the frig is gona have a GC and autosampler like sam,,,
yeh man,,,somethings wrong with GW but i dont think its lack of knolage,,,,Mr Watson will probbly put what they need in there hands so i dont know how they can go wrong,,,,i am actualy amazed at how mutch the share prices whent down,,,,i just dont get it,,,they should not have faild the placebo tests,,im sure it already works!!,,,someone is playing games!!
i also agree that humans sample weed better than any GC,,but inorder for it to become an sientific fact and not just remain just a phenomenon, we need to use a GC,,,,i think,
yeh man,,,,,the entourage effect (Mechoulam and Ben- Shabat 1999) is the reason i select for specific terpen profiles,,,,i think smelly-weed is the best for a reason,,,Cheese is highly theraputic because of this imo
its good to see you tom,,,ive been lucky enough to chat to you twice the last few days,,,hopefull my lucky streek will continue
ps
ive still not tasted your weed yet,,,,a friend of mine is probbly gona sort me out soon,,, so hopefully il be comin back with a raving review, praising your shiz,,
take care tom