SRGB
Member
Arminius:
Terpene Report Breakdown
Hi, Arminius.
Interesting chart. It might be beneficial (long-term) to sort the data into a linear flow chart, or outline, or other graph for simpler readability. Plain text might work, as well, without a `graphical` representation.
While we have no position one way or the other relevant to the data itself, what we found to be particularly interesting were the presentation of the data, in particular the `Benefits et al.` sections. The only `slice` that nearly - appeared - to present the data as a `positive`, or `definitive` was perhaps `Menthol, Camphor`.
Perhaps the data could be interpreted as the presumptive results possible potential to widely differ or vary amongst a large enough `test` group or `population`? Perhaps raw scientific progress (i.e., `transparency`), nonetheless; where absolutes (relevant to descriptions of presumptive results) might be (`delicately`) well considered within the given context? In any event, thanks for sharing the `raw data` .
hi life 45:
When I talked to Sound Co2 a few months ago (a co who does co2 xtractions)
they said that the extract from certain oregon outdoor will smell like pine trees just from plants growing near all the doug FIR trees in the area. The trim would smell like the strain, but the terps from the trees must fall onto the plant somehow because they extract would have a piney taste and smell.
Hi, hi life 45.
See, in general terroir. Vintners might be very familiar with this; viticulture is also considered a `branch` of horticulture; where like principles relating to `terroir` might be applicable to virtually all plants or trees.
Kind reagrds,
/SRGB/
Terpene Report Breakdown
Hi, Arminius.
Interesting chart. It might be beneficial (long-term) to sort the data into a linear flow chart, or outline, or other graph for simpler readability. Plain text might work, as well, without a `graphical` representation.
While we have no position one way or the other relevant to the data itself, what we found to be particularly interesting were the presentation of the data, in particular the `Benefits et al.` sections. The only `slice` that nearly - appeared - to present the data as a `positive`, or `definitive` was perhaps `Menthol, Camphor`.
Perhaps the data could be interpreted as the presumptive results possible potential to widely differ or vary amongst a large enough `test` group or `population`? Perhaps raw scientific progress (i.e., `transparency`), nonetheless; where absolutes (relevant to descriptions of presumptive results) might be (`delicately`) well considered within the given context? In any event, thanks for sharing the `raw data` .
hi life 45:
When I talked to Sound Co2 a few months ago (a co who does co2 xtractions)
they said that the extract from certain oregon outdoor will smell like pine trees just from plants growing near all the doug FIR trees in the area. The trim would smell like the strain, but the terps from the trees must fall onto the plant somehow because they extract would have a piney taste and smell.
Hi, hi life 45.
See, in general terroir. Vintners might be very familiar with this; viticulture is also considered a `branch` of horticulture; where like principles relating to `terroir` might be applicable to virtually all plants or trees.
Kind reagrds,
/SRGB/