i mean when you using more males instead of females this gives you more genetic variations and less more chances of bottlenecking...
i know what you mean, but that only occurs if you're using one female and lots of males, or visa versa. ie. you'll get more genetic variation using 10 males on one female than 5 males on one female. by the same rule, using 1 male on 10 females will result in as equally healthy offspring as using 10 males on 1 female, because what you have is 11 individuals combining their genes in both scenarios, it doesn't matter which are male and which are female, as long as they are all breeding together, but if you cut the numbers from 11 to 6 using 1 female and 5 males or 5 females and 1 male, both of those scenarios are as genetically healthy as one another, but in comparison to the 11 (10f/1m or 1f/10m) it is a bottle neck, you've lost 5 individuals from your Ne (effective population size). do you get what i mean mate?