Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
Lol. You can't even properly quote words typed out in front of you.
"Has the president or anyone at the White House"
I was Quoting Bill Barr
Lol. You can't even properly quote words typed out in front of you.
"Has the president or anyone at the White House"
Barr can't just pick people to spy on. I'd like to see what was presented to the grand jury that approved those warrants. I suspect a lot of BS was told to that jury.
if you look hard enough, you can find a judge willing to sign off on anything handed to him. just like the old saw about a DA being able to indict a ham sandwich if they want to...anyone that thinks all judges are impartial defenders of truth & justice can see their own tonsils from below. many are firmly entrenched against anyone the govt accuses of anything, much like the "jurors" that say "if he wasn't guilty of something, we wouldn't be sitting here..."
I hope the corruption gets outed. Our country can't survive like this much longer. The people we elected are no longer serving the people that elected them. This is a recipe for a hell of a lot more people becoming radicalized.
There is a big difference in putting a case in front of a grand jury, and falsifying evidence and 17 material omissions in multiple FISA warrants. Considering the significance foreign intelligence issues in the Democrat party, surveillance is warranted. We can't get fang-fanged again.
You guys really don't see the irony, do you?
Personally, i find the irony to be front and center, but probably not the same way as you.
As for your dem/FISA conspiracy, would you care to explain that to us ill informed audience?
Funny you say conspiracy.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/con...etween two or,to achieve the agreement's goal.
Your cognitive dissonance is deafening. If you want truth go find it. You can continue to fall for the Leftist conspiracy theories, doesn't affect my life in any way. CNN will always be there to spoon feed you your daily issue of propaganda .
If a person makes wild bullshit claims, then the should be able to support such claims.
To do otherwise is kind of weak, isn’t it?
Then go for it, prove your bullshit.
I am not the one here making outlandish claims.
I am not the one here making outlandish claims.
Any discussions with pack is an endless pit of no return. It's not worth the effort.
These are facts. Horowitz report, Muller report, congressional testimony of every intelligence head.
There were 17 investigations, show me which one supports your conclusion. It shouldn't be that hard. I am just a conspiracy nut right. Show me where I am wrong.