but of course you need to flush with pool water and water-cure the buds to get all that poopage out before chopping.
water cure the buds before chopping? O_O What? will it work?
but of course you need to flush with pool water and water-cure the buds to get all that poopage out before chopping.
Contest? On a contest you get to win a prize.From an impartial observer:
Still looks like a pissing contest
wait what? which side are you on organics or chemicals? cuz organics is like the laziest method of growing ever, plant a seed and water when thirsty. after 4 months cut down, dry and smoke.alot of people are lazy and unmotivated. simple.
The pumpkin grower reference brings up an excellent point...They use synthetics nutes to boost their pumpkins to an otherwise unachievable size, and this is a prime example of using chemicals in conjunction with an organic system for a desired "benefit", in this case, a freaking massive pumpkin. I don't know for sure, but I'm willing to bet that none of those giant pumpkins would taste any good if you cracked them open, organic or not. If we liken this to cannabis, we'd be talking about a lollipop-type grow with an attempt at achieving the largest single top cola possible. Again it comes down to yield, and yield alone.
What most here believe is that organic quality is superior to that of an entirely chemical grow, and that quality is far more important and desirable (not to mention worthy of bragging rights) than GPW or overall yield. If your goal is to produce as much weed as possible in the shortest amount of time, most money are putting their money on hydroponics hands down, especially if you're factoring veg time into play. If you're going for a private stash of the best tasting buds with the most complex high that cannabis has to offer, I'm putting my money on an organic soil grow. I choose to grow organic for a whole host of reasons, but one of the biggest benefits in my eyes is the resulting product...the quality, not the quantity.
so it all just breaks down to quality vs quantity and not chem growers vs organic growers.
It is a matter of personal preference and not a matter rivalry.
maybe the problem is you guys don't understand chemistry. lemme try again.
The pumpkin grower reference brings up an excellent point...They use synthetics nutes to boost their pumpkins to an otherwise unachievable size, and this is a prime example of using chemicals in conjunction with an organic system for a desired "benefit", in this case, a freaking massive pumpkin. I don't know for sure, but I'm willing to bet that none of those giant pumpkins would taste any good if you cracked them open, organic or not. If we liken this to cannabis, we'd be talking about a lollipop-type grow with an attempt at achieving the largest single top cola possible. Again it comes down to yield, and yield alone.
What most here believe is that organic quality is superior to that of an entirely chemical grow, and that quality is far more important and desirable (not to mention worthy of bragging rights) than GPW or overall yield. If your goal is to produce as much weed as possible in the shortest amount of time, most folks are putting their money on hydroponics hands down, especially if you're factoring veg time into play. If you're going for a private stash of the best tasting buds with the most complex high that cannabis has to offer, I'm putting my money on an organic soil grow. I choose to grow organic for a whole host of reasons, but one of the biggest benefits in my eyes is the resulting product...the quality, not the quantity.
pretty sure most guano out there ceased to be bat poop a while ago...
but of course you need to flush with pool water and water-cure the buds to get all that poopage out before chopping.
The absolute biggest buds I have seen and smoked were big bud. They were huge and heavy, but only so so in quality. None of my crowd messes with it anymore.......scrappy
It's hard to say with a name like 'Big Bud' but there was and is a strain out of Portland, Oregon called 'Big Bud' and has been around since the 1980's. It was developed as a 'cash cropper' and like you said it produces the biggest colas most people have ever seen. It was and is complete sh*t. Worthless. Nada. Zilch. Nix.
CT Guy and Sam87, you guys answered the questions. Thank you very much! Exactly the asnwers I was waiting for.
Ok so pumpkin growers use both organic/chemicals? But doesn't the salt kill bacterias? I wonder how that works!
respect!
I don't get it
on the bat poo thing, bat guano is further processed by insects so guano is really mostly beetle poo, or fossilized beatle poo
the flushing thing - well im thinking thats a bit of an in-joke, because you cant really 'flush' organics by leaching water through the soil.... but thats a whole other can o' worms... lets not go there
VG
Well now there is someone to disagree and what an aggressive manner that someone's taking
Well you did miss 4 very important advantages that I mentioned.
Also. Wtf so ok you are using chemical nutes for soil...
But why SOIL??? I see absolutely no reason for taking soil as medium in that case. You will be better off with say coco or some easy hydro setup using chemicals. Why do you go and put chemicals into dirt? I see no advantages. You will even be better of using rockwool or hydroton...
Also there is a huge difference in taking vitamin C pills and eating an orange. If you don't know that oranges have enzymes which are very important things that help to digest stuff that only orange itself contains. While your pill contains pure helpless dead matter of almost no help at all....
In orange's case enzymes work as construction workers helping to place every brick at the right place. In the case of the pill you are just loading yourself with alot of bricks that are of no help.