this thread doesnt feel like its cannadian.
Neither does this legislation. Once its past were going ass backward for peopel going to jail for growing out of the regulatory system, its like he wants us to be like the USA.
this thread doesnt feel like its cannadian.
They're not going to issue licenses to the general public. They'll claim it becomes too hard to enforce the laws, increases the likelihood of black market diversion, makes unacceptable security risks for the general public if the plants are detected, etc.
They'll then turn around and say that now you've got your legal cannabis anyone who steps outside of their monopoly is trying to supply children, is a tax cheat, is inviting dangerous criminals to your neighbourhood, etc. which they'll spam all over the news as evidence to get the public on their side which they'll then likely use to get access to smart meter data so they can target home growers.
There's no room for us in their world as we are a direct threat to their bottom line and that's not going to be tolerated. They'll call on the government to continue the war against us and they'll win in the end too. So as much as it sucks for you guys thanks for being the example to the world we all needed. Hopefully the rest of the world wakes up and sees the horror show going down in Canada before we pass our own laws
I think what people are missing is the fact that throughout history its proven that governments dont become less oppressive, they become MORE oppressive. As evidenced with C45. The idea is to create the licenses and a whole new enforcement body paid by government. CIVIL SERVANTS! Glorified welfare from the state. This is all by design and the two things governments want both are coming..MOre money, more control!! Licenses/Authorization will be needed under C45 and Inspectors will be coming. Thats the whole idea. " you wanna grow? Well, we coming in your house then to see what we can fine you for or how our little geek inspector on a power trip can shake money outta ya ".. Wake da fug up...lolol
Still Crickets about the " without Authorization in (6), eh?LMAO! Im telling ya people, I know whats up...
I agree with the likely hood that the 4 plant idea is completely scraped out. BUt, as it stands, you will need " authorization" and inspectors are whats coming per that bill. They even lay out inspector powers dealing with PRIVATE homes and property.
Call this thread whatever ya want..Im still right..lol
Mandatory roadside tests are not constitutional as it says you are guilty right off the hop and is an invasion of privacy as there is not set limit for impairment so the test unfairly invades someones privacy as it cannot be used to determine impairment. If they set a limit for impairment they must also give details and scientific evidence to prove in the general population those impairment levels would be accurate which they don't have at all, not to mention the differing body chemistries of people will metabolize the compounds at different levels and rates. Could you imagine people loosing their licence from smoking a joint a week before, 6 hours before? No evidence of impairment levels makes the test unconstitutional period good luck to the people trying to enforce it.
I have a copy of the PDF in the link below ready to be given to any pigs who want to play ball.Trial Judge’s Decision
The trial judge found that the officer's basis for proceeding to arrest and then to search Mr. Janvier
for possession of marihuana was the smell of burned marihuana and suspicion as to the presence of
more, unsmoked marihuana. He held that this was insufficient to provide the necessary grounds to
arrest or search.
(by the way, unrooted clones are not technically plants in Canada.
uuuummmm, now i feel pretty dumb.
Why dude? Have you been growing for 36 fucking years and still buying shit seeds?
I am not sorry, however, if I at all offended you.
if you read thru the entire document, it later clarifies that in the case of the plant count, only one adult can grow 4 plants and it clearly says propagating, cultivating,harvesting at any one time. To me that says 4 plants.
the outdoor part is confusing as it is suggesting to me that an outdoor vegging plant is okay but that no flowering plants on public property. Private property isn't public property but no it doesn't look like they have spelled out the outdoor on one's property very clearly.
The 30 grams posession and the ability to legally travel with 4 non flowering plants is interesting.
I fear canadians are in for a seed to harvest or clone to harvest tracking tag system in your future. They have made new crimminal code for advertising cannabis products on sites originating outside canada and it looks to me like importing genetic material like seeds and pollen are also being fortified by your crimminal code. 14 years maximum for importing cannabis , products or advertising outside canada yikes!!
lots of 5000.00 fines thrown in for all kinds of control over the little things.
I would like a definition of what the government defines as illicit cannabis, how do they plan to differentiate?
Still Crickets about the " without Authorization in (6), eh?LMAO! Im telling ya people, I know whats up...
I agree with the likely hood that the 4 plant idea is completely scraped out. BUt, as it stands, you will need " authorization" and inspectors are whats coming per that bill. They even lay out inspector powers dealing with PRIVATE homes and property.
Call this thread whatever ya want..Im still right..lol
This bill will never pass as it is a giant leap backwards from right now( against our charter). The court system and the judges are smarter than pigs and they play a lot differently. The judges are already showing it by the lenient fines and lack of jail time, it is already happening.
my opinion silvi