Koroz
Member
I don't see where you quoted gives people in counties that ban sales the right to grow. All it says it the right to possess small amounts. Sure it doesn't outright ban it, but you don't think SB/IE/SD won't argue that this only gives someone to possesive a small amount of processed cannabis that they will have to get from a "friendly" county and have no right to grow in the county they live?
I'm sure it would. But would it matter either way? You act like San Diego, SB/IE all follow the rule of the law, I don't live in Santa Barbara, or Inland Empire, but I did live in San Diego for many many many years. They are by law required to follow Medicinal Cannabis laws but they don't.
So not sure I see your point....
Regardless of what any initiative says, San Diego at least will not honor it and will fight it just as they have all the Medicinal use laws that have been put into effect. What the change did was at least allow people to have small amounts compared to what it was before which was nothing at all.
But as I said, it doesn't matter now. Read the last post by me quoting the lawyer who left the initiative group and formed his own. We shouldn't even be, in my opinion anyways, working with the taxcannabis2010.org group at all. We should be getting the word out to drop all conversation, and contact with them and start supporting the new initiative setup by Joe and the group of defense lawyers who are writing a more robust and protective initiative.