What's new

5000 barrels a day of oil (210,000 gallons) leak off the coast of Louisiana

Status
Not open for further replies.
That too is the governments fault. What in the constitution gives them the right to own the land being drilled? Nothing. They are allowed to own a small amount of land and buildings which are required to carry out their constitutional duties. BP doesn't own any of that, but they must pay market value for whatever can be proven to have leaked. In that case I'd hide the shit too. Whose "greedy" in that scenario? Government who does nothing but expects to be paid.

If there was private ownership BP would never be out there in the first place. 1000 people would be drilling their own land (on land) instead, and making sure every drop went into a barrel to be sold.

Alaska, there would be no asking some putz down in San Fran or Washington for permission to drill their own land in their own state. They would already be producing.
 

NOKUY

Active member
Veteran
we should all send BP a thank you card for the gift of our new "undersea oil volcano"

...im being sarcastic :wave:
 

hoosierdaddy

Active member
ICMag Donor
Veteran
It is nice that you have quoted this part of the text to put it in a more positive way, but you forgot the rest
I really wasn't quoting anything, I was simply paraphrasing what I remember the guy had said on a TV interview.
His main point was that the '79 spill cleaned itself up far faster than he or any of his associates thought possible. And it was ultimately nature that cleaned up the mess, as most of their attempts were making very little headway.
I wasn't trying to spin it in any direction other than what the man was saying. Although he was an optimistic soul and you could tell by his demeanor. Optimism seems to be a rarity these days.
 

Danks2005

Active member
So, it's not that big a deal because the Gulf is resiliant and will clean itself after 20years. Tell that to the commercial fisherman, oyster farmers, and hotel owners.
 
A

Amos Moses

The Gulf Oil Conspiracy

The Gulf Oil Conspiracy

Well, you knew it had to arrive sooner or later, so, here goes!

Why did BP CEO Tony Hayward sell off 1/3 of his BP stock only weeks before the oil rig explosion?

Why did Obama ok deep water oil exploration only weeks before the oil rig explosion?

Why did the Obama administration act so slow and commit no resources to the oil disaster?

Why did BP provide the highest amount of campaign contributions of any single politician to Obama, an anti-fossils fuels fanatic?

Why has there been no concerted effort by the White House to assist in "plugging" the leak?

Why is it that only conservative-leaning states happen to be ignored when it comes to disaster assistance with this White House?

Why does Obama ignore requests for assistance to stop the ecological disaster that has happened?

Why is Obama suddenly pushing "green" alternatives and criticizing conservatives instead of addressing the problems?

Does it have to do with the problem that Democrats are having at the polls and come this November they stand to be decapitated?

The health care fiasco pales in comparison to this disaster So does the 3 trillion dollar deficit and the 13 trillion dollar debt.....soon to be 17 trillion dollars!

Ignore the fact that nothing was done to lower unemployment, except to hire a half million more federal workers!

Ignore the fact that terrorism is a greater threat to western civilization now than ever before! Obama has shown a weak hand and the enemies of the West are motivated!

Is Obama and his chief of staff trying to play us again? Is this how he intends to pass cap and trade and, in addition, try to stop the Republican takeover of Congress this fall?

The union thugs are already getting ready to bully and pounce on any anti-Obama, anti-Democrat message. The pro-green and anti-conservative commercials are already flooding the air waves.

This is democracy at it's finest! :jump:

Amos :wave:
 
It’s been 37 days since BP’s offshore oil rig, Deepwater Horizon, exploded in the Gulf of Mexico. Since then, crude oil has been hemorrhaging into ocean waters and wreaking unknown havoc on our ecosystem — unknown because there is no accurate estimate of how many barrels of oil are contaminating the Gulf.

Though BP officially admits to only a few thousand barrels spilled each day, expert estimates peg the damage at 60,000 barrels or over 2.5 million gallons daily. (Perhaps we’d know more if BP hadn’t barred independent engineers from inspecting the breach.) Measures to quell the gusher have proved lackluster at best, and unlike the country’s last big oil spill — Exxon-Valdez in 1989 — the oil is coming from the ground, not a tanker, so we have no idea how much more oil could continue to pollute the Gulf’s waters.

Jefferson Parish Homeland security director Deano Bonano responds to government inaction.

The Deepwater Horizon disaster reminds us what can happen — and will continue to happen — when corporate malfeasance and neglect meet governmental regulatory failure.

The corporate media is tracking the disaster with front-page articles and nightly news headlines every day (if it bleeds, or spills, it leads!), but the under-reported aspects to this nightmarish tale paint the most chilling picture of the actors and actions behind the catastrophe. In no particular order, here are 10 things about the BP spill you may not know and may not want to know — but you should.

1. Oil rig owner has made $270 million off the oil leak

Transocean Ltd., the owner of the Deepwater Horizon rig leased by BP, has been flying under the radar in the mainstream blame game. The world’s largest offshore drilling contractor, the company is conveniently headquartered in corporate-friendly Switzerland, and it’s no stranger to oil disasters. In 1979, an oil well it was drilling in the very same Gulf of Mexico ignited, sending the drill platform into the sea and causing one of the largest oil spills by the time it was capped… nine months later.

This experience undoubtedly influenced Transocean’s decision to insure the Deepwater Horizon rig for about twice what it was worth. In a conference call to analysts earlier this month, Transocean reported making a $270 million profit from insurance payouts after the disaster. It’s not hard to bet on failure when you know it’s somewhat assured.

2. BP has a terrible safety record

BP has a long record of oil-related disasters in the United States. In 2005, BP’s Texas City refinery exploded, killing 15 workers and injuring another 170. The next year, one of its Alaska pipelines leaked 200,000 gallons of crude oil. According to Public Citizen, BP has paid $550 million in fines. BP seems to particularly enjoy violating the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts, and has paid the two largest fines in the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s history. (Is it any surprise that BP played a central, though greatly under-reported, role in the failure to contain the Exxon-Valdez spill years earlier?)

With Deepwater Horizon, BP didn’t break its dismal trend. In addition to choosing a cheaper — and less safe — casing to outfit the well that eventually burst, the company chose not to equip Deepwater Horizon with an acoustic trigger, a last-resort option that could have shut down the well even if it was damaged badly, and which is required in most developed countries that allow offshore drilling. In fact, BP employs these devices in its rigs located near England, but because the United States recommends rather than requires them, BP had no incentive to buy one — even though they only cost $500,000.

SeizeBP.org estimates that BP makes $500,000 in under eight minutes.

3. Oil spills are just a cost of doing business for BP

According to the Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, approximately $1.6 billion in annual economic activity and services are at risk as a result of the Deepwater Horizon disaster. Compare this number — which doesn’t include the immeasurable environmental damages — to the current cap on BP’s liability for economic damages like lost wages and tourist dollars, which is $75 million. And compare that further to the first-quarter profits BP posted just one week after the explosion: $6 billion.

BP’s chief executive, Tony Hayward, has solemnly promised that the company will cover more than the required $75 million. On May 10, BP announced it had already spent $350 million. How fantastically generous of a company valued at $152.6 billion, and which makes $93 million each day.

The reality of the matter is that BP will not be deterred by the liability cap and pity payments doled out to a handful of victims of this disaster because they pale in comparison to its ghastly profits. Indeed, oil spills are just a cost of doing business for BP.

This is especially evident in a recent Citigroup analyst report prepared for BP investors: “Reaction to the Gulf of Mexico oil leak is a buying opportunity.”

4. The Interior Department was at best, neglectful, and at worst, complicit

It’s no surprise BP is always looking out for its bottom line — but it’s at least slightly more surprising that the Interior Department, the executive department charged with regulating the oil industry, has done such a shoddy job of preventing this from happening.

Ten years ago, there were already warnings that the backup systems on oil rigs that failed on Deepwater Horizon would be a problem. The Interior Department issued a “safety alert” but then left it up to oil companies to decide what kind of backup system to use. And in 2007, a government regulator from the same department downplayed the chances and impact of a spill like the one that occurred last month: “lowouts are rare events and of short duration, potential impact to marine water quality are not expected to be significant.”

The Interior Department’s Louisiana branch may have been particularly confused because it appears it was closely fraternizing with the oil industry. The Minerals Management Service, the agency within the department that oversees offshore drilling, routinely accepted gifts from oil companies and even considered itself a part of the oil industry, rather than part of a governmental regulatory agency. Flying on oil executives’ private planes was not rare for MMS inspectors in Louisiana, a federal report released Tuesday says. “Skeet-shooting contests, hunting and fishing trips, golf tournaments, crawfish boils, and Christmas parties” were also common.

Is it any wonder that Deepwater Horizon was given a regulatory exclusion by MMS?

It gets worse. Since April 20, when the Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded, the Interior Department has approved 27 new permits for offshore drilling sites. Here’s the kicker: Two of these permits are for BP.

But it gets better still: 26 of the 27 new drilling sites have been granted regulatory exemptions, including those issued to BP.

5. Clean-up prospects are dismal

The media makes a lot of noise about all the different methods BP is using to clean up the oil spill. Massive steel containment domes were popular a few weeks ago. Now everyone is touting the “top kill” method, which involves injecting heavy drilling fluids into the damaged well.

But here’s the reality. Even if BP eventually finds a method that works, experts say the best cleanup scenario is to recover 20 percent of the spilled oil. And let’s be realistic: only 8 percent of the crude oil deposited in the ocean and coastlines off Alaska was recovered in the Exxon-Valdez cleanup.

Millions of gallons of oil will remain in the ocean, ravaging the underwater ecosystem, and 100 miles of Louisiana coastline will never be the same.

6. BP has no real cleanup plan

Perhaps because it knows the possibility of remedying the situation is practically impossible, BP has made publicly available its laughable “Oil Spill Response Plan” which is, in fact, no plan at all.

Most emblematic of this farcical plan, BP mentions protecting Arctic wildlife like sea lions, otters and walruses (perhaps executives simply lifted the language from Exxon’s plan for its oil spill off the coast of Alaska?). The plan does not include any disease-preventing measures, oceanic or meteorological data, and is comprised mostly of phone numbers and blank forms. Most importantly, it includes no directions for how to deal with a deep-water explosion such as the one that took place last month.

The whole thing totals 600 pages — a waste of paper that only adds insult to the environmental injury BP is inflicting upon the world with Deepwater Horizon.

7. BP is sequestering survivors and taking away their right to sue

With each hour, the economic damage caused by Deepwater Horizon continues to grow. And BP knows this.

So while it outwardly is putting on a nice face, even pledging $500 million to assess the impacts of the spill, it has all the while been trying to ensure that it won’t be held liable for those same impacts.

Just after the Deepwater explosion, surviving employees were held in solitary confinement, while BP flacks made them waive their rights to sue. BP then did the same with fishermen it contracted to help clean up the spill though the company now says that was nothing more than a legal mix-up.

If there’s anything to learn from this disaster, it’s that companies like BP don’t make mistakes at the expense of others. They are exceedingly deliberate.

8. BP bets on risk to employees to save money — and doesn’t care if they get sick

When BP unleashed its “Beyond Petroleum” re-branding/greenwashing campaign, the snazzy ads featured smiley oil rig workers. But the truth of the matter is that BP consistently and knowingly puts its employees at risk.

An internal BP document shows that just before the prior fatal disaster — the 2005 Texas City explosion that killed 15 workers and injured 170 — when BP had to choose between cost-savings and greater safety, it went with its bottom line.

A BP Risk Management memo showed that although steel trailers would be safer in the case of an explosion, the company went with less expensive options that offered protection but were not “blast resistant.” In the Texas City blast, all of the fatalities and most of the injuries occurred in or around these trailers.

Although BP has responded to this memo by saying the company culture has changed since Texas City, 11 people died on the Deepwater Horizon when it blew up. Perhaps a similar memo went out regarding safety and cost-cutting measures?

Reports this week stated that fishermen hired by BP for oil cleanup weren’t provided protective equipment and have now fallen ill. Hopefully they didn’t sign waivers.

9. Environmental damage could even include a climatological catastrophe

It’s hard to know where to start discussing the environmental damage caused by Deepwater Horizon. Each day will give us a clearer picture of the short-term ecological destruction, but environmental experts believe the damage to the Gulf of Mexico will be long-term.

In the short-term, environmentalists are up in arms about the dispersants being used to clean up the oil slick in the Gulf. Apparently, the types BP is using aren’t all that effective in dispersing oil, and are pretty high in toxicity to marine fauna such as fish and shrimp. The fear is that what BP may be using to clean up the mess could, in the long-term, make it worse.

On the longer-term side of things, there are signs that this largest oil drilling catastrophe could also become the worst natural gas and climate disaster. The explosion has released tremendous amounts of methane from deep in the ocean, and research shows that methane, when mixed with air, is the most powerful (read: terrible) greenhouse gas — 26 times worse than carbon-dioxide.

Our warming planet just got a lot hotter.

10. No one knows what to do and it will happen again

The very worst part about the Deepwater Horizon calamity is that nobody knows what to do. We don’t know how bad it really is because we can’t measure what’s going on. We don’t know how to stop it — and once we do, we won’t know how to clean it up.

BP is at the helm of the recovery process, but given its corporate track record, its efforts will only go so far — it has a board of directors and shareholders to answer to, after all. The U.S. government, the only other entity that could take over is currently content to let BP hack away at the problem. Why? Because it probably has no idea what to do either.

Here’s the reality of the matter — for as long as offshore drilling is legal, oil spills will happen. Coastlines will be decimated, oceans destroyed, economies ruined, lives lost. Oil companies have little to no incentive to prevent such disasters from happening, and they use their money to buy government regulators’ integrity.

Deepwater Horizon is not an anomaly — it’s the norm.

http://www.infowars.com/10-things-you-need-but-dont-want-to-know-about-the-bp-oil-spill/
 

Hash Zeppelin

Ski Bum Rodeo Clown
Premium user
ICMag Donor
Veteran
all I can do is read this with my jaw dropped. it makes me wanna cry. it makes me wanna kill bp executives. It is time for Israel to send out assassins to kill bp executives.
 

Dojo

Member
Lol why isreal? why not russian?

Anyways this is all BP's fault...not obama

It is obamas fault for caving in and trying to make republicans happy and passing "drill baby drill"...

And guys i dont know how many rigs are out thier in the ocean (im assuming hundreds) but this is just one that is leaking....god forbid somthing happens to the others....

This mess could have been avoided if we wasnt so dependant on oil...we should of been gone green

But leave it to america....and americans for that matter to only react...never acting

Added:The goverment seems like its not helping...why? Well if you had plumbing problems would you call the hvac man to help?
 
Last edited:
M

Marywanna

BP also contributed generously to Obamas Campaign. We all know what this latest ass kick will do to the economy. No party lines,just greed and power on all parts.
 
This thread can interchanged with any other conspiracy. And Obama's name and administration can be interchanged with any other preisdent and administration. It doesn't matter, and never has mattered.

Please stop being blinded by the whole 'Democrat and liberals vs. Republican and conservatives', because they are both corrupt, greedy and serve the ones that contribute the most money.

Corporations like BP and private individuals who can donate large sums of money know this. When Republicans are popular with the majority of voters, most of their donations go the Republican candidates and incumbants on the local, state and federal levels of government. When Democrats are popular with the majority of voters, most of their donations go the Democrat candidates and incumbants on the local, state and federal levels of government.
 
A

Amos Moses

This thread can interchanged with any other conspiracy. And Obama's name and administration can be interchanged with any other preisdent and administration. It doesn't matter, and never has mattered.

Please stop being blinded by the whole 'Democrat and liberals vs. Republican and conservatives', because they are both corrupt, greedy and serve the ones that contribute the most money.

Corporations like BP and private individuals who can donate large sums of money know this. When Republicans are popular with the majority of voters, most of their donations go the Republican candidates and incumbants on the local, state and federal levels of government. When Democrats are popular with the majority of voters, most of their donations go the Democrat candidates and incumbants on the local, state and federal levels of government.

I agree with you. I am neither Republican nor Democrat. I cannot affiliate myself with "party" loyalty. That, in itself, implies an ignorance of true democracy and freedom of thought.

I am simply pointing out what I believe is the beginning of a campaign to turn public opinion against fossil fuels and raise the price of energy.

This is some information put together by someone else on another site I thought was interesting:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

While serving with Weather Underground bomber Bill Ayers' brother, John Ayers, on the Board of the Joyce Foundation in Chicago (1994-2002), and then state Senator in Illinois, Barack Obama, funded the establishment of the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX). The Head of the CCX quotes the future worth of the annual business of the CCX at TEN TRILLION DOLLARS, 2/3 of the worth of the trading of all American businesses on the financial exhanges per year (FIFTEEN TRILLION DOLLARS).

Who owns the CCX? Fifty percent ownership is GOLDMAN SACHS. Another 10% is owned by an outfit out of London which includes Al Gore, David Blood/Goldman Sachs, + 3-4 other former Goldman Sachs executives.

How did the CCX get major funding from 2002-2010? Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are heavily invested in the CCX.

The CCX stands to make its 10 TRILLION DOLLARS per year once Obama gets the Congress to unwittingly pass the infamous Cap & Trade Bill, personally crafted and overseen by Obama and his cronies.

The Cap & Trade Bill will cause your electricity energy costs in your homes and businesses to (in Obama's own words) "SKYROCKET". The Cap & Trade Bill taxes businesses AND individuals for carbon dioxide emissions. CO2 is what we all exhale when we breathe out. You would be taxed for each person you have in your family for their CO2 emission and at whatever tax rate the government adopted. You would also be required to retrofit your HOME and business with the energy saving devices for heating and cooling, etc. that the government (and their buddies that sell the devices) say that you must now install.

The cap and trade bill is a total scam. Al Gore stands to make at least a BILLION dollars if the Cap & Trade bill passes. The whole purpose behind needing to pass the Cap & Trade bill is to avoid adding to the Global warming problem.

THERE IS NO FREAKING GLOBAL WARMING PROBLEM!!!

Barack Obama was made President so he could push the Cap & Trade bill through Congress OR sign an equivalent Executive Order.

Barack Obama is guilty of the LARGEST EXAMPLE OF INSIDER TRADING THAT HAS EVER AND WILL EVER HAPPEN ON THE PLANET!!!

Barack Obama was in on causing the "Big Economy FAIL" of the United States BEFORE it was put into motion by Fannie mae and Freddie Mac (WHILE Obama's Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, was a Director at Freddie Mac in 2000-2001 and an Illinois Congressman framer of the $787 Bail Out bill in 2008).

Board of Directors for Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. ("Freddie Mac"), 2000-2001

While at Freddie Mac Rahm made sure that Freddie Mac’s mortgage lending policy was to lend to anyone who had ever been employed at any time and in any capacity, whether or not that was only in the past, i.e. he promoted lose bank lending practice. While at Freddie Mac Rahm made sure that the “watchdog” position at Freddie Mac, the one who was supposed to prevent corruption and embezzlement activities remained vacant. When an investigation into Freddie Mac was deemed necessary, the lack of an individual in the in-house watch dog position at the institute temporarily stalled this effort.

U.S. Congressman (D-IL) 108th U.S. Congress, 2003-2009

One of Rahm’s first legislative act in Congress was to pass legislation that permanently derailed the investigation into Freddie Mac’s solvency that Rahm had stymied while still on the Board of Freddie Mac. Rahm did this by switching what agency serves as the investigative agency over Freddie Mac. Rahm’s last acts before leaving Congress was to help write the Banker’s Bailout Bill legislation and lobby heavily for its passage with help from generous donations to members of Congress by Wall Street bankers.
In the 2008 election cycle, Rahm ended up being the House’s top recipient of contributions from hedge funds, private equity firms and the broader securities and investment industry.

White House Chief of Staff (2008-2010).

Upon leaving the Congress Rahm was offered the Directorship of the Democratic National Committee, but turned it down. Still he was the fourth-ranking Democrat in the House behind Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Leader Steny Hoyer, and Whip Jim Clyburn. Rahm knew it would be in his best interest to serve instead as Obama’s Chief of Staff.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amos :wave:
 
A

Amos Moses

Hey Dojo, if you thought that one was funny look at this one:


-------------------------------------------------------------------

US Orders Blackout Over North Korean Torpedoing Of Gulf Of Mexico Oil Rig

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

A grim report circulating in the Kremlin today written by Russia’s Northern Fleet is reporting that the United States has ordered a complete media blackout over North Korea’s torpedoing of the giant Deepwater Horizon oil platform owned by the World’s largest offshore drilling contractor Transocean that was built and financed by South Korea’s Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd., that has caused great loss of life, untold billions in economic damage to the South Korean economy, and an environmental catastrophe to the United States.

Most important to understand about this latest attack by North Korea against its South Korean enemy is that under the existing “laws of war” it was a permissible action as they remain in a state of war against each other due to South Korea’s refusal to sign the 1953 Armistice ending the Korean War.

To the attack itself, these reports continue, the North Korean “cargo vessel” Dai Hong Dan believed to be staffed by 17th Sniper Corps “suicide” troops left Cuba’s Empresa Terminales Mambisas de La Habana (Port of Havana) on April 18th whereupon it “severely deviated” from its intended course for Venezuela’s Puerto Cabello bringing it to within 209 kilometers (130 miles) of the Deepwater Horizon oil platform which was located 80 kilometers (50 miles) off the coast of the US State of Louisiana where it launched an SSC Sang-o Class Mini Submarine (Yugo class) estimated to have an operational range of 321 kilometers (200 miles).

On the night of April 20th the North Korean Mini Submarine manned by these “suicidal” 17th Sniper Corps soldiers attacked the Deepwater Horizon with what are believed to be 2 incendiary torpedoes causing a massive explosion and resulting in 11 workers on this giant oil rig being killed outright. Barely 48 hours later, on April 22nd , this North Korean Mini Submarine committed its final atrocity by exploding itself directly beneath the Deepwater Horizon causing this $1 Billion oil rig to sink beneath the seas and marking 2010’s celebration of Earth Day with one of the largest environmental catastrophes our World has ever seen.

To the reason for North Korea attacking the Deepwater Horizon, these reports say, was to present US President Obama with an “impossible dilemma” prior to the opening of the United Nations Review Conference of the Parties to the Treat on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) set to begin May 3rd in New York.

This “impossible dilemma” facing Obama is indeed real as the decision he is faced with is either to allow the continuation of this massive oil leak catastrophe to continue for months, or immediately stop it by the only known and proven means possible, the detonation of a thermonuclear device.

Russian Navy atomic experts in these reports state that should Obama choose the “nuclear option” the most viable weapon at his disposal is the United States B83 (Mk-83) strategic thermonuclear bomb having a variable yield (Low Kiloton Range to 1,200 Kilotons) which with its 12 foot length and 18 inch diameter, and weighing just over 2,400 pounds, is readily able to be deployed and detonated by a remote controlled mini-sub.

Should Obama choose the “nuclear option” it appears that he would be supported by the International Court of Justice who on July 8, 1996 issued an advisory opinion on the use of nuclear weapons stating that they could not conclude definitively on these weapons use in “extreme circumstances” or “self defense”.

On the other hand, if Obama chooses the “nuclear option” it would leave the UN’s nuclear conference in shambles with every Nation in the World having oil rigs off their coasts demanding an equal right to atomic weapons to protect their environment from catastrophes too, including Iran.

To whatever decision Obama makes it remains a fact that with each passing hour this environmental catastrophe grows worse. And even though Obama has ordered military SWAT teams to protect other oil rigs in the Gulf of Mexico from any further attack, and further ordered that all drilling in the Gulf of Mexico be immediately stopped, this massive oil spill has already reached the shores of America and with high waves and more bad weather forecast the likelihood of it being stopped from destroying thousands of miles of US coastland and wildlife appears unstoppable.

And not just to the environmental catastrophe that is unfolding the only devastation to be wrecked upon the United States and South Korea by this North Korean attack as the economic liabilities associated with this disaster are estimated by these Russian reports to be between $500 Billion to $1.5 Trillion, and which only a declaration of this disaster being an “act of war” would free some the World’s largest corporations from bankruptcy.

Important to note too in all of these events was that this was the second attack by North Korea on its South Korean enemy, and US ally, in a month as we had reported on in our March 28th report titled “Obama Orders ‘Immediate Stand-down’ After Deadly North Korean Attack” and which to date neither the Americans or South Korea have retaliated for and giving one senior North Korean party leader the courage to openly state that the North Korean military took “gratifying revenge” on South Korea.

And for those believing that things couldn’t get worse, they couldn’t be more mistaken as new reports coming from Japanese military sources are stating that North Korea is preparing for new launches of its 1,300 kilometer (807 miles) intermediate range ballistic “Rodong” missile which Russian Space Forces experts state is able to “deploy and detonate” an atomic electromagnetic pulse (EMP) device, and which if detonated high in the atmosphere could effectively destroy the American economy for years, if not decades, to come.

© May 1, 2010 EU and US all rights reserved

[Ed. Note: Western governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagrees with in believing that it is every human beings right to know the truth. Due to our missions conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ against us has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit and which is addressed in the report “Who Is Sorcha Faal?”.]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Whatever. Remember, this is a conspiracy thread, Not a political one.

Have fun! :jump:

Amos :wave:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top