Ron Paul 2012!!! Your thoughts on who we should pick for our "Cause"?

[Sam_Skunkman]

I never post in political threads, but here I go...
Few if any politicians really support Cannabis on any level, Ron Paul just does not want to spend Federal funds to enforce Marijuana prohibition, he is not a real Cannabis supporter in the sense that I am. Lets face it, we are a small voting block with little influence, that is why Cannabis laws are so crazy and have been getting worse for many years.
I voted for Obama, but never again, I know his policies are not good for Cannabis.
I hope one day to be able to vote for someone that supports Cannabis for all its uses, or at least will legally allow Cannabis even if they have no personal interest besides freedom and justice for all.
Also lets be honest, if the military industrial complex thought that Ron Paul had any chance he would be gone, they have way to much to lose....

-SamS

 

[CannaBunkerMan]

This is the first electoral season since 1947 that there hasn't been a Bush running for office in the country. The decline in America can be traced directly to Reagan for the start. Ron Paul can't magically legalize pot. The laws can only be changed by Congress. There's no magic wand or executive order he can do that will legalize pot, so get past that one, isn't gonna happen. There is no way Paul will get elected, Gingrich was right his views are to far out for most of the rebulicants to fall for.

What he CAN do, and has been hinting at it all along, is to pardon all of the non-violent drug offenders, just as quickly as the justice system locks them up.

 

[CannaBunkerMan]

DO NOT expect him to do anything if he gets elected, because he simply cannot.

Right off the bat, if he does NOTHING all term, it would still be better than another term of Obama bringing the country backwards.

 

[itisme]

No, No, No, they all fucking suck! It's one party dudes. And, none of them really care about "our" cause, unless they can get reelected supporting it.

Speak for yourself as I see him as easily the best canidate for my vote on my issues.

Discobisuit he has disemboweled those newsletters since he was aware of the 12 lines that got published under his name for over 20 years. He has served much longer and that's all you got. Some bullshit racist card that don't hold water to anybody that puts two seconds of thought into it.

I know your type and I remember you......You'll quickly make up the same line of bullshit again just so that is what people read last....You have a hidden agenda and I know it...........

Try this on for size. Give us your candidate and we'll see what we can conjure up on them, or some solutions of your own better than Dr. Paul's (LMAO)....I like RON PAUL 2012 and his chances against anybody else you can bring up and I bet most in here would too!

 

[itisme]

Ron Paul is a total tool, did you happen to hear about his racist newsletters he wrote in the past, hell makes the KKK look decent!

See Disco you feed into ignorance like this....unless that is your end game....He didn't even write the letters and nobody that isn't spewing rhetoric knows that much at least, he published them when he was a full time Dr. and part time publisher who didn't read everything and those lines were never seen by Dr. Paul prior to publishing them. When he was notified he completely disemboweled them for over 20 years now!!!

dis·em·bow·eled or dis·em·bow·elled, dis·em·bow·el·ing or dis·em·bow·el·ling, dis·em·bow·els
1. To remove the entrails from.
2. To deprive of meaning or substance.

The not so hidden objective - I am sure you are either ignorant or knew this already and you are just trying to discredit an honest man. SHAME ON YOU! - I think disco is a socialist that wants the public ill informed and to believe there is no God so that way we can't believe in country or faith. Be strong and get educated gang. You'll see RON PAUL 2012 is the ticket!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Rv0Z5SNrF4

 

[dagnabit]

I find it hilarious these poor ignorant folks think the president is powerless....
The DEA was created by XO and could be abolished in the same way.


Looks like naval conflict with Iran within the next month or so. Mamoud(s) will attempt to block hormuz in response to sanctions(what an idiotic idea sanctions are). We "wont allow" the straight to be blocked(1/3 of the worlds oil passes).
Dr. Paul would not allow us to go to war for oil yet again....
Think O will?

 

[itisme]

I feel like you have to be an idiot to vote for anyone else, but this is America and i support Discobiscuts right to vote lol.

His entire quote was great but this part cracked me up

Ron Paul agrees with this message

 

[DiscoBiscuit]

See Disco you feed into ignorance like this....unless that is your end game....He didn't even write the letters and nobody that isn't spewing rhetoric knows that much at least, he published them when he was a full time Dr. and part time publisher who didn't read everything and those lines were never seen by Dr. Paul prior to publishing them.

Paul takes credit for the non-stupid shit.

The fact is, we don't know who wrote what. But the cabal used the newsletters to make money. I've always considered Alex Jones a stain to journalism but it's looking more and more like he's getting his material from Lou Rockwell.

I'm merely curious whether Paul actually believes all the conspiracy stuff. I'm merely curious whether Paul would have national name recognition less his newsletters and web sites like prisonplanet and infowars.

What's really troubling is the fact this cabal makes money from stuff that insights more fear and loathing than actually exists otherwise. Does the so-called FEMA tomb liner and trailer scare-tactic baloney come from Lew and crew? If it does, they might as well hop a covered wagon and sell snake oil.

 

[itisme]

The fact is we don't know who wrote what.

Try this on for size. Give us your candidate and we'll see what we can conjure up on them, or some solutions of your own better than Dr. Paul's (LMAO)....I like RON PAUL 2012 and his chances against anybody else you can bring up and I bet most in here would too!

as predicted.

Yes we do fool. He was the publisher that never saw them and disemboweled them for the 1 trillionth time.

Hidden Agenda driven bullshit by you is all you got so you lose!

Where are the solutions from you or candidate of your choosing DISCOBULLSHIT???

1. See not one recommendation from the hidden agenda driven disco.

2. Not a candidate

3. or an original Idea.

4. Just hidden agenda driven bullshit.

5. Where are you questions on his policies?

6. Where are the questions on principles?

7. Where is anything in this thread you said positive or give credit to? and don't try to discredit Dr. Paul with the same thing fo 33 pages?

8. I KNOW YOU AND YOU HIDDEN AGENDA IS ABOUT AS COVERT AS OBAMA's AND BUSH's WERE! SHAME ON YOU!

 

[bentom187]

heres some stories that should wake some of us up... trully disturrbing abuses of power they'll use against anyone.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=272_1324235641

http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security-technology-and-liberty/wtf-what-fawkes

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=37723

http://lewrockwell.com/grigg/grigg-w240.html

http://lewrockwell.com/grigg/grigg-w239.html

 

[DiscoBiscuit]

If you to stupid to know the difference between a writer and publish you should just stop. WE KNOW YOUR HIDDEN AGENDA!!!
The fact is, we don't know who wrote what.

Way to go! You edited out practically the same comment.

Yes we do fool. He was the publisher that never saw them and disemboweled them for the 1 trillionth time.

Take a look at one of em... or at any of em.

Editor - Ron Paul

Hidden Agenda driven bullshit by you is all you got so you lose!

I have nothing to hide. I've brought as much or more info to this thread than anybody, short of bentom187. Hats off to the guy for keeping it relevant.

Where are the solutions from you or candidate of your choosing DISCOBULLSHIT???

Do you want that in your Ron Paul thread? One doesn't necessitate the perfect solution to nix Ron from their potential list. IMO, there aren't any perfect candidates but that won't keep me from voting.

Check your blood pressure.

1. See not one recommendation from the hidden agenda driven disco.

No hidden agenda. Some of us don't count on baloney conspiracies to point out objective aspects.

2. Not a candidate

Read the thread. I mentioned Gary Johnson as well as other candidates several times. Not as my potential presidential vote but just to point out there's more than one candidate campaigning for some form of legalization.

3. or an original Idea.

Read the thread. I've pointed out several times that Ron's economic ideas are historic failures. Then again, I wouldn't expect folks to recognize, much less consider the history they're apparently too disinterested to reference.

4. Just hidden agenda driven bullshit.

Get off the hidden whatever already. I haven't even hidden the fact I won't vote for the guy.

5. Where are you questions on his policies?

Wouldn't you value history's view of uh, history more than my objections? You are in luck, though. You only have to page back to reference my personal observations.

Any questions I might ask would only be answerable by Ron. What exactly would Ron do if and when his economic policies actually shrink working class opportunity? I've asked several IC members the same in so many words. What I consider relevant questions are never answered, short of bentom187's references. Unfortunately, these references don't address any post effects. They're merely pre-effect.

6. Where are the questions on principles?

It depends on which principles you're talking about. I don't blame Ron for hiding the appropriations sausage into marked-for-pass legislation. He's not the only lawmaker who dodges more typical requests to the respective appropriations sub-committees, the president, etc.

It's just when he attempts to make a principled name for himself by eschewing earmarks. Especially for the largest earmark in Texas.

The same guy who says he can't see racism sees 95% of DC black males as criminal or wanna-be criminals.

I have more to disagree than agree with the current president. Is there a single thing you disagree with Ron or do you simply ignore anything that doesn't ring the bell?

7. Where is anything in this thread you said positive or give credit to? and don't try to discredit Dr. Paul with the same thing fo 33 pages?

You'll discover much more through reading than you will direct questing. I'm not under your klieg lights and I don't have to play 20 questions. But every question you've asked has received at least one response. You merely disagree. But hey, it's a free country.

8. I KNOW YOU AND YOU HIDDEN AGENDA IS ABOUT AS COVERT AS OBAMA's AND BUSH's WERE! SHAME ON YOU!

I know I've responded to yet more pejorative-laden screed without having to lower myself to same. The idea I'm hiding anything is bonkers. It's not unlike suggesting that turning on the light hides scurrying roaches.

 

[bentom187]

heres his plan ,i hope you like graphs and charts
http://c3244172.r72.cf0.rackcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/RestoreAmericaPlan.pdf

the assertion that it would shrink working class oppertunity is silly,it actually empowers you to start your own with a small savings and gives you a level playing field and no one has a right to your earnings( no income tax) but you ,so you can re-invest or perhaps give a portion to a good cause.
it sounds a whole lot more promising then starting abuisness with a half million dollar loan having to pay it back with variable intrestrates and fail after youve been regulated to death and and a union works its way in.

of course all these numbers or said bisnuess plan is arbitrary,but the underlying changes in the Plan To Restore America would make any plan more viable.

 

[kmk420kali]

Take a look at one of em... or at any of em.

Editor - Ron Paul

He was only listed as Editor on the Investment ones, and not even on all those--

 

[johnnyblazin']

Disco and everybody needs to chill out. I think you're a bit misinformed about his views and think that something written under his name is the same as him writing it. If he was a racist wouldn't his racism show up in his policies and actions? I'm not going to argue because I disagree with Paul on his stance on immigration but other than that the guy is the best in the Republican field but to call him racist because of something a guy working for him wrote is over the line. Other than the newsletters what is your problem with him and who do you intend to vote for?

Anyway, I don't even think this thread should be here, all it does is cause problems in our community and drive a wedge between us. Politics should never be discussed. Edit: I forgot to mention that Gary Johnson is a nice guy and all but he's running as the Libertarian candidate which is only a tiny base of support.

 

[stonedstoner]

glad to see there are more nonpaul supporters posting in this thread now.

edit* i'm refering to megayields post.

 

[DiscoBiscuit]

He was only listed as Editor on the Investment ones, and not even on all those--

Personal observation?

 

[stonedstoner]

heres some stories that should wake some of us up... trully disturrbing abuses of power they'll use against anyone.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=272_1324235641

http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security-technology-and-liberty/wtf-what-fawkes

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=37723

http://lewrockwell.com/grigg/grigg-w240.html

http://lewrockwell.com/grigg/grigg-w239.html

so you do get your news from lew rockwell

 

[stonedstoner]

you would think he would put out an apology newsletter as soon as he found out about the racist shit in the newsletter if he really didn't write or read it. someone would have alerted him that this racist shit was out there right? so why wouldn't he make sure that an apology newsletter went out as soon as he found out about it? he could explain himself in the newsletter and let people know that it was someone else who wrote the previous racist newsletter. i think that's what most politicians would do.

 

[itisme]

DISCOBISCUIT don't hide behind the fact we are mostly supporting Ron Paul to not put something costructive in the thread.

Read the title! Ron Paul 2012!!! Your thoughts on who we should pick for our "Cause"?

So who do you want and why? You can't pick somebody not running. LMAO!

Where is your ideas or your "causes" or your candidates.

Your in here spewing rhetoric and you don't want a valid discussion.

 

[bentom187]

so you do get your news from lew rockwell

when i see somthing that i think fits the narritive of reality and it makes common sense from a objective and subjective view points and the evidence adds up, then i tend to go along with it.

most if not all news comes from AP/reuters first, thinking theres a difference from cnn to fox isnt going to help anyone,you can tell specificly from how well they co-ordinate attacks recentley on ron paul.

and FYI it was bought a long time ago bt J.d rockerfella and other banking elites.