What's new

Another sad message from our elected ones...

trichrider

Kiss My Ring
Veteran
The other day I heard that our governer would refuse to sign a bill that both houses of State Legislature had passed. The law would have allowed for medical cannabis dispensaries in the state.

After threatening letters from US Attorneys, she said she was afraid of legal consequences for state employees.

What does that say to all the patients in chronic pain, or with wasting syndrome, or some other debilitating condition?

Yeah, that's what I imagined too.

"She says there are problems with the state's medical marijuana law that make it difficult for sick people to obtain the drug, and she will cooperate with lawmakers to address those issues."

...a blurb from her response...obvious she is not cooperating with lawmakers to address the issue.

Here is the governers e-mail address for anyone else who wants her to know what you think of her malarkey.

http://www.governor.wa.gov/contact/default.asp
 

OjoRojo420

Feeling good is good enough.
Veteran
The more I read shit like that the more my resolve to keep getting deeper and deeper underground... Elected officials are NOT to be trusted with this issues.

Ojo
 
1

187020

keep the viagra flowing or she doesn't stand a chance of seeing a nice stiffy
 

PoopyTeaBags

State Liscensed Care Giver/Patient, Assistant Trai
Veteran
They may be elected by us but they work for big business...


they pay them to run and everything else... are system is bought and payed for... and its now 100% legal to buy any politician..... woohooo go usa
 

wco68

Member
man the fed sure love blackmail. i wounder what happen to that peace of paper that said we the people when to.
 

PoopyTeaBags

State Liscensed Care Giver/Patient, Assistant Trai
Veteran
they are using it as toilet paper right now and whipping there asses with it..
 

GanjaPharma

Member


:laughing: pretty sure thats printed on hemp!


normally (read article 3 section 12 of the state constitution for the fun rules of veto powers) a WA governor has 5 days to sign or veto (line item veto as well) then it becomes law either way.
if the bill is sent to her with fewer than 5 days left in the session (as in this case hmmm) then she has 20 days, excluding sundays or it becomes law.
so she has until the 14th of MAY to veto/sign.

sooooooo.
I have been googling to find a statement from the gregoirgoyle saying she would "VETO" the bill. so far other than inacurate newspaper headlines reading "governor will veto bill" I cant find anything but statements from her saying she "cannot sign a bill that blah blah bullshit blahblah lies and more bullshit" (paraphrasing there).

soooooo:
mebe the political thing for her to do is just let it become law without signing it. she is on record against the bill (so she can enter into pseudo liberal obama circles)
and she also avoids a risk of full legalization via voter initiative in 2012.

thoughts?
 

DiscoBiscuit

weed fiend
Veteran
I read the letter from the two US atty's in Wa state. According to the letter to the governor, wording makes large ops possible - in violation of fed law.

One might think the legislature could amend the wording accordingly. Heretofore, states haven't exceeded the federal limit so state law prevents fed raids (so sayeth the AG).
 

Hydrosun

I love my life
Veteran


:laughing: pretty sure thats printed on hemp!


normally (read article 3 section 12 of the state constitution for the fun rules of veto powers) a WA governor has 5 days to sign or veto (line item veto as well) then it becomes law either way.
if the bill is sent to her with fewer than 5 days left in the session (as in this case hmmm) then she has 20 days, excluding sundays or it becomes law.
so she has until the 14th of MAY to veto/sign.

sooooooo.
I have been googling to find a statement from the gregoirgoyle saying she would "VETO" the bill. so far other than inacurate newspaper headlines reading "governor will veto bill" I cant find anything but statements from her saying she "cannot sign a bill that blah blah bullshit blahblah lies and more bullshit" (paraphrasing there).

soooooo:
mebe the political thing for her to do is just let it become law without signing it. she is on record against the bill (so she can enter into pseudo liberal obama circles)
and she also avoids a risk of full legalization via voter initiative in 2012.

thoughts?

I don't want to look up the WA veto power but I know the US Federal power and if not signed and the congress is out of session it is called a "Pocket Veto" (the bill dies).

It is possible that WA is not like this, but I don't know enough about wa.

:joint:
 

GanjaPharma

Member
guess i shouldve included this earlier
......If any bill shall not be returned by the governor within five days, Sundays excepted, after it shall be presented to him, it shall become a law without his signature, unless the general adjournment shall prevent its return, in which case it shall become a law unless the governor, within twenty days next after the adjournment, Sundays excepted, shall file such bill with his objections thereto,.....

also, regarding the Guvs line item veto powers , she cant pick and choose, only veto an entire SECTION which i think will limit her ability to fuk this up good n proper.

... If any bill presented to the governor contain several sections or appropriation items, he may object to one or more sections or appropriation items while approving other portions of the bill: Provided, That he may not object to less than an entire section,....
 

Hydrosun

I love my life
Veteran
As you said she has her finger in the wind, her ass is already covered by refusing to sign; however if there is more political gold in a VETO it sounds like she'd sell out the WA people in a second.

:joint:
 

MadBuddhaAbuser

Kush, Sour Diesel, Puday boys
Veteran
Unfortunately I can empathize with shitty governors fucking up the will of the people.

Good luck out there.
 

Rednick

One day you will have to answer to the children of
Veteran
It's almost like these people don't know who they work for...
Oh, they know who they work for. The people with the funding to get them re-elected.
:blowbubbles:
T.V. Ads cost money...And the people watch their box and do what it tells them. Period.
 

wemary

Member
Oh, they know who they work for. The people with the funding to get them re-elected.
:blowbubbles:
T.V. Ads cost money...And the people watch their box and do what it tells them. Period.

Yep, try listening to Atmosphere-White Noise, pretty good song, there are better ones about t.v etc. but i cant find them right now,
 

Rob547

East Coast Grower
Veteran
I've always liked that White Noise song and alot of Atmosphere lyrics in general. I know Shadows Fall and I believe Incubus have songs named 'The Idiot Box'.

Staring forward with vacant eyes
Imagination Cannot survive
Misinformation and compromise
These televised conditioned lies
Create a system of belief
Heartless purveyors of deceit


Idk if anyone here has seen it but there is a youtube video of a computer programmer, under oath, saying that he has been bribed by officials to rig elections...
 
Top