#9 and #12 for me , although #15 seems to have a nice conical shape if you're looking for an outdoor monster
Hi Darwin
First thanks for taking the time to post your work. I am confused and have a couple of thoughts about your project I was hoping you could clear up. From my understanding Landraces refer to the plants ability to adapt to the natural environment of origin. Sometimes a formalized breed retains the "landrace" name, despite no longer being a true landrace. This is the case with many MIS strains. Many of which where bred after leaving Afghanistan for many generations. There are Afghan Landrance for sale for sure, you maybe even have your hands on some. I really would not know. You'd know they hate getting root bound and are notorious for large plants, GN's MIS has that distinct broad leaf. I guess my point is, that with such a massive variation in Landraces, having 20 or so individuals is a little shy of that huge variation in phenotypes (taste, potency, yield, flavor, growth, disease/mold resistance). Cannabis has grown down under for years no problem, however it is not a native plant at all. to say we are preserving a Landrace, Im not sure were there yet ? I cant see any true preservation of Landrace genetics here. If your trying to add some afghan plant phenos to your garden, Ill go with 9. Best of Luck, Personally I hope you do stumble across something very potent and fast finishing. Peace
A landrace is a local variety of a domesticated animal or plant species which has developed largely by natural processes, by adaptation to the natural and cultural environment in which it lives. It differs from a formal breed which has been bred deliberately to conform to a particular standard type. Landraces are usually more genetically and physically diverse than formal breeds. Many formal breeds originated from landraces, and sometimes a particular type has both landrace and formal breed populations. Sometimes a formalised breed retains the "landrace" name, despite no longer being a true landrace.
more is always going to be better mate when it comes to effective population size (the amount of individuals reproducing with one another) in this case it's 28. but where do you draw the line? is 50 enough? is 1000 enough? is a single field of 10 000 enough? the importance of Ne decreases exponentially, once you get above 30 or so there's going to be little difference between using 30 and 100 plants if you're open pollinating the lot, especially if they're not a worked line, the level of heterozygosity remains high, which means that more phenotypes and genotypes will be hidden in the genes that can appear once you do an open pollination with those initial 30. yes 100 would be better, but only slightly, not enough to really worry me too much. i'm not trying to save every single genotype of every single landrace out there, that is not my mission, but i am aiming to do the best that i can with the resources i have to grow out each landrace i have with as large a Ne as possible and open pollinate the lot to end up with 1000s of seeds to help conserve the genetics the strain. me wanting to make IBLs on top of that isn't for preservation, that's my own breeding interest. cheers mate
darwin
We cannot assume anything. We must find out.Until then we cannot estimate how many individuals to represent. Like you said, its a hard one. Im doing a similar project with selected afghan/pre soviet genetics, using as many individuals as I can to represent that population and I am no where near close. Some smells like tangerine, others liqource and other fuel, all produce a very dense product. Im excited for both your RSC and GN. Im hoping you can find a special keeper ! Tagged m8
cheers mate, good luck with your projects too and send me the link if you've got them up on here i'd love to scribe and watch hopefully the GN arrive ok and i can get to them in the future