So there's quite an uproar in a very narrow interest group about the legalization initiative- the growers.
On the one hand, the 5x5/1oz limit seems draconian to growers, and some fear that smoking near a minor will lead to jail time.
On the other hand, people who responsibly consume cannabis will no longer be arrested and go to jail.
It seems that the vast majority of the illegal and future "legal" smoking population do not need more than an ounce at a time and will not grow more than one plant at a time, if they grew at all. So it would follow that this initiative would benefit adults when the bottom line is that they can smoke pot legally and walk around without fear and paranoia.
There's talk of the gang of four in Oakland, who want to monopolize the industry. Talk of county governments having the power to allow and regulate cannabis transactions. Perhaps the initiative is intentionally murky about some details, for if it was crystal clear, it might not have the support it does today. If the bill said "cannabis will have no restrictions whatsoever, anything can do whatever they want with it" would it have the same support it does today? Probably not.
I agree that cannabis should be legal as lettuce, but many people don't who are also the people that support TC2010 for adults. I see the initiative as an opportunity to pass, and if it passes, then people can smoke pot, go to the beach or whatever it is they like to do, and be completely stress-free about being out and about and high. That's a win, any way I look at it.
If not now, when? Who's going to organize enough people for another initiative, who's going to put the time, money, and resources towards grassroots movements like Richard Lee did?
Baby steps people, baby steps.
Now, I welcome comments about important details that I overlooked. I didn't get into enforcement details because its an unknown consequence that's not significant enough to snuff out the gains (imo).
On the one hand, the 5x5/1oz limit seems draconian to growers, and some fear that smoking near a minor will lead to jail time.
On the other hand, people who responsibly consume cannabis will no longer be arrested and go to jail.
It seems that the vast majority of the illegal and future "legal" smoking population do not need more than an ounce at a time and will not grow more than one plant at a time, if they grew at all. So it would follow that this initiative would benefit adults when the bottom line is that they can smoke pot legally and walk around without fear and paranoia.
There's talk of the gang of four in Oakland, who want to monopolize the industry. Talk of county governments having the power to allow and regulate cannabis transactions. Perhaps the initiative is intentionally murky about some details, for if it was crystal clear, it might not have the support it does today. If the bill said "cannabis will have no restrictions whatsoever, anything can do whatever they want with it" would it have the same support it does today? Probably not.
I agree that cannabis should be legal as lettuce, but many people don't who are also the people that support TC2010 for adults. I see the initiative as an opportunity to pass, and if it passes, then people can smoke pot, go to the beach or whatever it is they like to do, and be completely stress-free about being out and about and high. That's a win, any way I look at it.
If not now, when? Who's going to organize enough people for another initiative, who's going to put the time, money, and resources towards grassroots movements like Richard Lee did?
Baby steps people, baby steps.
Now, I welcome comments about important details that I overlooked. I didn't get into enforcement details because its an unknown consequence that's not significant enough to snuff out the gains (imo).