Cannabis is already Legalized in California (and I'm going to prove it)
- Thread starter FreedomFGHTR
- Start date
nice post man 
I just found out that Richard Lee fired Dennis Peron from Oaksterdamn U. for his anti tax and regulation speech. I will be getting a copy of the video from his last lecture as an Oaksterdamn professor and post it for you guys to see!
B
Blue Dot
That's a video I'd like to see.
Who does this richard lee guy think he is anyway?
Who does this richard lee guy think he is anyway?
Oaksterdam?? The same business that is trying to "tax and regulate" marijuana for the state of California??
I am not very educated on anything political or business like, as I am still half way young, but I couldnt agree more with freedom.,.. you are a true inspiration my friend..
anyway I can subscribe to all your threads?? lol.
I am not very educated on anything political or business like, as I am still half way young, but I couldnt agree more with freedom.,.. you are a true inspiration my friend..
anyway I can subscribe to all your threads?? lol.
ForestBuds
Member
Freedom for all!
Freedom for all!
FF, Thank you for blazing a new trail in history and informing others! This is more than tax nor regulation. This is about true freedom! I find freedom in cannabis. It is what has brought me out to California. This is not about yours or mine benefit but for betterment for all of mankind and mother nature.
If what the OP is saying is in fact what Prop 215 was originally for. I say let it remain and have it be more clarified for all in court!
Outdoor grown Lavender close up that was harvested on Fourth of July 2009 in Sacramento, CA.
Freedom for all!
FF, Thank you for blazing a new trail in history and informing others! This is more than tax nor regulation. This is about true freedom! I find freedom in cannabis. It is what has brought me out to California. This is not about yours or mine benefit but for betterment for all of mankind and mother nature.
If what the OP is saying is in fact what Prop 215 was originally for. I say let it remain and have it be more clarified for all in court!
Outdoor grown Lavender close up that was harvested on Fourth of July 2009 in Sacramento, CA.
C'mon man...you have many...many valid points...please don't cheapen them by adding this...to your "Generic" name--
The name is as generic as Coca Cola, Budweiser, Tillamook Cheese. California Cannabis Incorporated is a real corporation in California. Last time I checked copyrights and trademarks were a very real and serious thing. Also very Valid.
Their initiative could give the wrong impression about California Cannabis Incorporated and infer support for their initiative from us when infact we vehemently oppose it.
B
Blue Dot
Well, I still see the red cross in your avy and now that i think about, the damn flag of CA's gotta be copyrighted, trademarked, etc. also so maybe you need to talk to your "art' dept. 
Well, I still see the red cross in your avy and now that i think about, the damn flag of CA's gotta be copyrighted, trademarked, etc. also so maybe you need to talk to your "art' dept.
You should have a discussion with the California Secretary of State. and here is an interesting article that expands on the subject. http://www.seomoz.org/blog/how-screwed-am-i-another-business-has-the-same-name-as-mine
Yet another of FF "Pipe Dreams"
The "Corporation" he speaks of...
California Cannabis Inc.
is a coupla guys that deliver Weed
out of an Apartment
that applied for a Buss lic.
thats all
Nothing more Nothing less
The "Corporation" he speaks of...
California Cannabis Inc.
is a coupla guys that deliver Weed
out of an Apartment
that applied for a Buss lic.
thats all
Nothing more Nothing less
B
Blue Dot
That article proves my point.
But since cali's #1 cash crop IS MJ I think it's safe to assume the state of CA is INDEED in the MJ industry, WHETHER THEY WANT TO ADMIT IT OR NOT. lol
Yet another of FF "Pipe Dreams"
The "Corporation" he speaks of...
California Cannabis Inc.
is a coupla guys that deliver Weed
out of an Apartment
that applied for a Buss lic.
thats all
Nothing more Nothing less
Kinda funny because we are smack dab in the middle of the map http://www.newsreview.com/sacramento/content?oid=1156946
http://www.newsreview.com/binary/082b/map.jpg
We are upstairs from a Bar. in a C2 zoned area. Hardly an apartment.
And yes we are a REAL corporation.
http://kepler.sos.ca.gov/corpdata/ShowAllList?QueryCorpNumber=C3192413
yeah my name and address is on there. You show up unanounced and unknown there will be some problems.
Well good luck with your crusade. I certainly hope you did better research than you did with your Patrick Kelly project, though it doesn't look like it. Bluedot pointed out the statistical problem with using voter's intent and you responded with a point about ballot arguments being allowable - a totally different topic.
I said "Generic", not as a put down on your name, simply that "California Cannabis" is a common phrase, and I don't think you can copyright those...it would be like opening a Brewery, and calling it, "Cold Beer"...you could not make ppl not use that phrase--
smokesalot420
Member
FF, thanks for standing up to make your point! Is there anything other Californians can do to support or help? Let me know
I'm not a lawyer or anything, but I'd be hesitant to risk so much on your interpretation of voters' intentions. Just because a voter misinterpreted the law and on that basis voted for or against it, doesn't mean much. The law is the law. The courts make decisions based on the law as written, not what those who voted for the law were thinking. Haven't you ever voted for a particular piece of legislation or a particular candidate only to find out later you were wrong?
Id have to think ALL of us would be supportive of a NO TAX rule on medicinal cannabis, and that it would have been the intent of the original voters as well.
Best luck. -BhT
Best luck. -BhT
Danknuggler
Active member
Google "washington apples" or "washington apples trademark name" which is also very generic words/phrase and you will see it is a valid registered trade marked name.On the contrary I too have been looking into filing for articles, get name trademrkd etc. and I'm almost sure that Freedomfightr would have been denied way back at the application process had there been a problem with the name he had chosen.I mean you have to do your own homework on the name and trademark picture but he's legit period.Oh yeah and lets just say he was maybe working/living out of an apartment or actually has a grand office headquarters with cute office staff the works it doesn't matter.Dr bugreengens you can crawl back into the hole you peekd from to try and dog a fellow brother by attempting to belittle him you should be ashamed you dick!!Business is business.You have to start somewhere.Go Freedom!!!!!!!!!!!nugglerI said "Generic", not as a put down on your name, simply that "California Cannabis" is a common phrase, and I don't think you can copyright those...it would be like opening a Brewery, and calling it, "Cold Beer"...you could not make ppl not use that phrase--
nephilthim
Member
I voted for prop 215 I am a registered voter the ONLY thing about the political process I get excited for is BALLOT INITITIVES!prop 215 prop 36 prop 13.prop 13 was finallyamended by what? another proposition that lowered the threshold from 2/3 to a simple majority.
meaning the whole basis for modifying prop215 with s.b. 420 is unconstitutional based
on all attempts by any legislative body to modify prop13 being declared unconstitutional by state supreme court hence learned peoples ire to a.s.a
in the kelly decision.
I voted for prop 215 I read the ballot pamphlet.I
read the ballots arguments for and against and yes it was my intent for all those things given that people smoke cigarettes,drink alcohol,and take prescription narcotics.
g-luck freedom and I think anyone who voted in favor of prop 215 could send a friend of the court brief reiterating freedoms positions,and similar intents as a valid registered voter in
california.I am not sure what format?or if you would have to have notarized?or maybe allow legal depositions from people who voted for prop 215?that would weigh the court down with a lot of paperwork which would inherantly be in your favor!
meaning the whole basis for modifying prop215 with s.b. 420 is unconstitutional based
on all attempts by any legislative body to modify prop13 being declared unconstitutional by state supreme court hence learned peoples ire to a.s.a
in the kelly decision.
I voted for prop 215 I read the ballot pamphlet.I
read the ballots arguments for and against and yes it was my intent for all those things given that people smoke cigarettes,drink alcohol,and take prescription narcotics.
g-luck freedom and I think anyone who voted in favor of prop 215 could send a friend of the court brief reiterating freedoms positions,and similar intents as a valid registered voter in
california.I am not sure what format?or if you would have to have notarized?or maybe allow legal depositions from people who voted for prop 215?that would weigh the court down with a lot of paperwork which would inherantly be in your favor!
