Do you mean in the net pots as you're posting in the hydro forum?
Does it really make a huge difference in quality? Most of the roots would be under the pot no?
I haven't done any real hydro grows yet but I'm thinking Seramis or LECA.
Or maybe Seramis with a LECA topping. Works very well as a passive hydro medium. The roots seem to like the Seramis and the LECA topping prevents algae forming on the top.
Ok if that is what you meant I believe the best medium is water, provided as a fine mist to the roots (aeroponics). Or it gives the possibility for very precise nutrition control which then could be taken advantage of by a skilled grower to produce high quality buds. Not a silver bullet by any means.any soil-less medium is hydroponics
Living soil does not mean all water only, for all time. Living soil benefits from additional teas from time to time, especially since all conditions (especially indoor) have a few issues here and there.My 2 cents on living soil is sure you can get a good run or 2 but to maintain getting primo run after run after run after run by only feeding water yeah not convinced.
I wouldn't. I highly doubt the end result will be any better or worse in any medium if they are used correctly.
you think all hydro methods are equal?
I’ve yet to see living soil work better than hydro. I’ve grown the same clone in the same room in my buddies homemade soil vs a 3x3 hydro tray with pebbles.What medium would I use bass strictly on quality? Living soils, it's finally been proven unequivocally from what I've read and seen online that living soils and the plant communicate with one another and a healthy living soil allows the plant to hit its peak potential, I've also seen folks that are 34 years my senior that have been at this a lot longer than me stress their play it's a little bit. Just my opinion