Other way around on the list I'm afraid dag.
That makes more sense...
Some of those names didn't strike me as hawks.
So the named in bold deserve letters of support.
The others should be run out on a rail!
Other way around on the list I'm afraid dag.
Thats what im trying to figure out...
but someones default is obtuse.
... The others should be run out on a rail!
They're doing your bidding unless you're willing to allow terrorists to be tried in civilian courts.
That makes more sense...
Some of those names didn't strike me as hawks.
So the named in bold deserve letters of support.
The others should be run out on a rail!
Ever occur to edit the post?
allowed?
you don't "allow" an unalienable right...
that ALL men are endowed with these rights.
not some..
not the ones we agree with ALL men.
these aren't just words to me...
Didn't mean to be misleading. It's the military tribunal vs civilian court thing.
thats what the follow up was for...
i leave the error and the subsequent retraction for posterity
ohh i get it....
my reply still applies.
whatever lense you choose...Like a sink hole in the middle of the interstate and 300 feet down a sign says, "Watch out."
Since you're convoluted as always I'll clarify my point. If you don't want civilian trials for international terrorists, aka enemy combatants, you risk subjecting US citizens to the same treatment up to and including indefinite incarceration without charge.
WTF is convoluted exactly?
allowed?
you don't "allow" an unalienable right...
that ALL men are endowed with these rights.
not some..
not the ones we agree with ALL men.
these aren't just words to me...
thank youi realize you assume my position and can't handle your assumption being challenged.
i've said it several ways. i cant say it any plainer for you...
i want civilian trials for international terrorists, aka enemy combatants.
"i want civilian trials for international terrorists" is crystal clear.i believe the opening words of the letter to king george.
is that to convoluted for you?
... unless you don't understand in the first place or your predrawn conclusions are so strong as to override your processes...