TWO S1 LINE PRODUCES MALES
- Thread starter Hammerhead
- Start date
- Status
tell it as it really is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwOMnIuAGOY
within a strain line yes, accross the entire species no
within a strain line yes, accross the entire species no
breeding tri's lol, well, I guess it's something.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njG7p6CSbCU
203, fave song ever linked,
I got further with it than anyone else has. And using classical methods, with the male female still in tact, no selfing resorted to. And the smoke is still the one I want more than any other. If that's wasting my time, hows it hurt anyone? By them thinking tri's are better than bi's? How is that diff than people supporting diff sports teams? Aren't we all just fans of the same game?
I got further with it than anyone else has. And using classical methods, with the male female still in tact, no selfing resorted to. And the smoke is still the one I want more than any other. If that's wasting my time, hows it hurt anyone? By them thinking tri's are better than bi's? How is that diff than people supporting diff sports teams? Aren't we all just fans of the same game?
GMT, I thought it was plain my headache, as far as who it is hurting. I browse the boards only to find this huge ignorant nevil like clan talking about how 3 is better than two. You did that, back it the fuck up, or take it back, or deliver with more grains of salt because bullshit is the product. We have to look at that bullshit, cut it out, cease, desist. Not with the program, but with the parts of it that are clearly wrong, the parts that are getting through, and making eyes, twitch..
ie, 3 is not better than two, so how's that smoke, and only how's that smoke.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXpwOM6bHdI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXpwOM6bHdI
embrace it or battle it, but dont be afraid of it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcgT-7dXZ20
I'm rather proud that you feel that is down to me. Thankyou.
But please, provide some evidence or at least an argument that justifies your position beyond "we have both produced plants that spend too much effort on leaves, except one of us sells them and one doesn't". As at least for each of those "wasted" efforts there is a new point from which a bud can grow on my line. How that is a bad thing?
I'm rather proud that you feel that is down to me. Thankyou.
But please, provide some evidence or at least an argument that justifies your position beyond "we have both produced plants that spend too much effort on leaves, except one of us sells them and one doesn't". As at least for each of those "wasted" efforts there is a new point from which a bud can grow on my line. How that is a bad thing?
don't hate me for it Tom 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqyXO9Ko1s0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqyXO9Ko1s0
I have reviewed and embraced the evidence for 27 years now, on what you guys might agree was a rather large scale. I have told you like it is, there is no advantage to 3 over two. And yes, that people have removed their eyes from things like actual cellular reproduction rates during this madness gets under my skin, sue me. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XCVnV5CGh0
I have not failed here to make my point, I don't think, brother..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XCVnV5CGh0I have not failed here to make my point, I don't think, brother..
well, if it was just the leaves, then I guess I'd be forced to agree with your central point, but for me its about the extra branches. I'm an indoor grower, not an outdoor guy, height is an issue for me, so having more growth points within a height restriction, is something I'm genuinely struggling to see as a bad thing. The problem as I see it now, is that I prefer indicas, and how do I defend them against sativas which dont suffer the same problem with cellular reproduction? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyQ4QSsERxM
those extra branches cost you energy in other places, is the truth of the matter, surely you understand this concept. Listen I see "vigor" differently than you do apparently, I see sallies multiplying at the same rate as the broad leaves. I was under the assumption that we were amongst folk who understand what the fuck they are looking at.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCTKwF-NW4c
well I assume that you realise the leaves are what captures that energy in the first place. The more material there is to capture, the more the plant has to work with. Do you feel Im missing something there? That's a straight Q, if I am, then educate me please, if you're successfull I'll drop the tri thing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrThDHQ1am0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrThDHQ1am0
sweet jah believe you me I wish I could end it here and now but alas,,, We are speaking of ground rules, when in fact this plant is more adept at producing energy than that plant, regardless of solar panels and etc, so fuck, give me another way to end it, lol, you fucking heard me before, bathe in it, know it to be the truth. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifb623PBIIs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifb623PBIIs
Thing is Tom, I believe in comparing like with like rather than grapes to coconuts. All I can tell ya is that a tri pheno will out produce a bi pheno within my one line when left single cola. Now a multi topped bi or a well scrogged bi would out produce a single cola tri, but to talk about my line v another line or even worse, a plant in my home v a plant in someone else's home, or worse still v something outside, just isn't worth comparing at all. Its not a valid comparrison whether mine came out on top or at the bottom of the pile. For you to argue against that, seems pointless to me, as I'll say it again, I've seen it, you haven't. What others feel, or what the future will see as obvious is all a guess http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FgSmdfRUus
come on dude, don't do it, please don't do it, you've spent no small amount of time pushing rocks uphill. Be it this or dh lines, your thoughts have been checked, embrace that. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEMhJoXOFeU
- Status
