Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
Fraud Receipts...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DuOJJStt4w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DuOJJStt4w
-
Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
-
Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!
The Great Awakening
- Thread starter Hempy McNoodle
- Start date
Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
New York Times wants you to stop thinking critically!!
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/18/opinion/fake-news-media-attention.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/18/opinion/fake-news-media-attention.html
G
Guest
Is this why you haven't commented on my post re Galileo? You asked me a question, Man ...
only 8 days left to come up with some insane reason why what's his name isn't being inaugurated!
weather man says 0% chance of storm on march 4th!
weather man says 0% chance of storm on march 4th!
But 100% chance the goalposts will move by March 5th...
M
member 505892
That's not how Hempy rolls.... he has his idea of what makes him 'feel' smart lodged firmly in his bonce and then spends the rest of his time trying to bring the fantasy into existence.... because, if he doesn't- he will be left feeling pretty silly, which is unacceptable....
The 5 D's of Dodgeball- Dodge, Duck, Dip, Dive and.... Dodge.
Did you actually read the article?
Absolem
Active member
Hempy only reads headlines. All other gaps are filled in by the "Salty Cracker".
no,but he did watch a youtube video from a guy who also didn't read it and yet has very strong opinions about it...pretty much the same thing...
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
[/FONT]
Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
I didn't know you were expecting a comment. I will say that in your comment, you seem to fail to see how Galileo proves your original point (that a single person wont likely undermine an entire consensus of the 'scientific' community) to be erroneous.
Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
The march 4th thing is made up fake news as far as I can tell. For instance, I'm not expecting anything. Strawman argument? Me thinks so.
Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
Yes
I am confident that most people understand it as desperate Deep State propaganda. It is incredibly transparent and reeks of a loss of control over their false narratives. It's all crashing down. They are panicking and the whole world sees it.
Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
Essentially, the editorial shows that a college education will churn out "scholars" who don't debate anything on the substance, but instead go to known liars ("debonkers" and war hawk MSM) where they will tell you that anyone who disagrees with their blatently false narratives is a 'conspiracy theorist' and have been debonked, lol. All so that they can attack the person, not address the substance. If there is no more debate. What happens to science? What happens to truth. They are now teaching the exact opposite of critical thinking in colleges across the US.
Besides, isn't wikipedia known to be edited by CIA.
I mentioned wikipedia a few months ago as a good place to get an overview and many of you commented on how it is unacceptable. Yet, now you suddenly agree with the brainwash from NYT.
How interesting..
new term choking the brain = narrative
term with little meaning anymore = critical thought
The public knows nothing of debate between scientists. They are not privy.
term with little meaning anymore = critical thought
The public knows nothing of debate between scientists. They are not privy.
is that Stimpy in front? how CUTE...
Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
Scientific debate, which is an essential part of science, is being done away with. It has been slowly replaced over the last 15 years or so with the term 'consensus', which is pretty much the opposite of science. Science exists to break through 'consensus'. Consensus would imply that science is a democratic process (which it is not). Also, 'scientific consensus' is easily manipulated by HR departments at any and all institutions. I've seen so many examples of dissenting scientists losing their jobs for going against the pseudo-scientific narratives.
And if a scientist debates a pseudo-scientist, the pseudo-scientist will predictably use and hide behind another pseudo-scientific tool, 'Occam's Razor.'
Hempy McNoodle
Well-known member
Authoritarianism..
