spurr
I think that you misunderstood my post. I don't disagree with the effectiveness of any of the usual rooting agents - NAA, IAA, IBA, et al.
The banning of SurperThrive in a few states and several countries (last count I looked at was 25) is you can use any of the rooting agents you mentioned. No problem.
But you have to put it on the label. Period. And this isn't a 'Hippy Oregon' thing - even Oklahoma has banned SuperThrive. Not exactly a hot bed of liberal activists last time I checked.
As per NAA specifically, one of the grow store products uses NAA and I believe it's the Clonex brand. No problem selling it - it's right there on the label.
The issue isn't whether or not these agents aren't viable - it comes down to a public safety issue. Ingestion by a child or a pet and you tell the doctor "It's got secret stuff in it!" - pretty silly scenario.
Declare it and sell it. Pretty simple. Look for California to follow suit later this summer from prompting by CCOF and other groups.
CC
I think that you misunderstood my post. I don't disagree with the effectiveness of any of the usual rooting agents - NAA, IAA, IBA, et al.
The banning of SurperThrive in a few states and several countries (last count I looked at was 25) is you can use any of the rooting agents you mentioned. No problem.
But you have to put it on the label. Period. And this isn't a 'Hippy Oregon' thing - even Oklahoma has banned SuperThrive. Not exactly a hot bed of liberal activists last time I checked.
As per NAA specifically, one of the grow store products uses NAA and I believe it's the Clonex brand. No problem selling it - it's right there on the label.
The issue isn't whether or not these agents aren't viable - it comes down to a public safety issue. Ingestion by a child or a pet and you tell the doctor "It's got secret stuff in it!" - pretty silly scenario.
Declare it and sell it. Pretty simple. Look for California to follow suit later this summer from prompting by CCOF and other groups.
CC