In the context of the 1930,s her views were pretty tame , compared to what was said and enacted in Europe.
If you start deconstructing people from another era you can usually find something that offends current mores , and the good she did outweighs the dodgy rhetoric.
Ok so your distinction is time and place ,not the result's.
You have not defined the good of eugenics either. Except they are taking up resources of the "desirables".
I make the distinction because there has to be one in your view. Desirable vs undesirable.
What would be the distinction of who should have life and not, outside your own personal family ?
If it was good in another time and place why isn't it good now , in your opinion ?
They were aiming for the same end's , in Margaret Sanger's word's.
( Which were despicable) Also you agreed at the conclusion of your last post.
Why not do away with the niceties of controlled contraception by the state and just put the undesirables on trains , and off to facilities to be euthanized ?
Have fun trying to explain away Nazi policies.