I agree with hydro soil, all studies are like that. Global warming charts are usually quoted as changes across 10 or whatever years, they pick dates and say "look its significantly warmer". The issue with those is there is no scientific basis of picking the dates. The same charts say very different things by shifting the same 10 or whatever year timespan by a few years or decades depending on how long the sample is being taken over.
I am not fully denying global warming but to say that adding to 1/30 of 1% of the air will cause us to ruin the planet it too much to belive. The amazon is not the worlds largest forest its the worlds largest RAIN forest. The largest forest is in siberia and pratically not absorbing co2 at all because its currently in tundra conditons, when the planet warms the biggest c02 sink besides the oceans gets "turned on".
I will say this, trying to keep us on a fixed climate is not realistic, we have been warming since the last ice age.
I am not trying to derail the thread so no global warming talk please its just my example of how scientists are people with opinions also so all findings have to be scrutenised. Thats why scientists have peer reviews.
I am not fully denying global warming but to say that adding to 1/30 of 1% of the air will cause us to ruin the planet it too much to belive. The amazon is not the worlds largest forest its the worlds largest RAIN forest. The largest forest is in siberia and pratically not absorbing co2 at all because its currently in tundra conditons, when the planet warms the biggest c02 sink besides the oceans gets "turned on".
I will say this, trying to keep us on a fixed climate is not realistic, we have been warming since the last ice age.
I am not trying to derail the thread so no global warming talk please its just my example of how scientists are people with opinions also so all findings have to be scrutenised. Thats why scientists have peer reviews.