Maria_Vanessa
Member
9. Can There Be A "Mixed" Social System?
There can be no social system which is a mixture of Individualism and Collectivism. Either individual rights are recognized in a society, or they are not recognized. They cannot be half-recognized.
What frequently happens, however, is that a society based on Individualism does not have the courage, integrity and intelligence to observe its own principle consistently in every practical application. Through ignorance, cowardice, or mental sloppiness, such a society passes laws and accepts regulations which contradict its basic principle and violate the rights of man. To the extent of such violations, society perpetrates injustices, evils, and abuses. If the breaches are not corrected, society collapses into the chaos of Collectivism.
When you see a society that recognizes man's rights in some of its laws but not in others, do not hail it as a "mixed " system and do not conclude that a compromise between basic principles, opposed in theory, can be made to work in practice. Such a society is not working; it is merely disintegrating. Disintegration takes time. Nothing falls to pieces immediately -- neither a human body nor a human society.
http://www.laissez-fairerepublic.com/textbook.htm
I'm sorry, but, what are you talking about? I didn't see anything in your post regarding cannabis, so can you expain what youare trying to contribute?
These are good points. There are two distinct sides to this issue, and I find it difficult to believe that there is a chance of legislating one without infringing on the other.
What's to say, though, that allowing private entities to produce and distribute Cannabis with little to no regulation would prevent those places of Medical Research from producing effective cannabinoid-based medicines? Wouldn't deregulation (ie no nationalization) help both sides of the Cannabis industry? (The two sides being recreational and medicinal-These questions are aimed at no one person..)
If, say, Johns Hopkins didn't have to jump through so many hoops with the FDA and the like, isn't it reasonable to assume that more research would get done?
We also forgot one more thing. That is hemp. When we add hemp into the mix, it is the side of cannabis that could most likely be nationalized. But realistically, I think it would be turned into an agronomic crop like cotton and soybean and corn.
Realistically, regulation and deregulation are both inevitable; and I think both would help all three sides of the cannabis industry. The general voting public will want regulation it would be enacted by the government on private and public entities regardless of they are producing for industrial, medical or recreational industries. But, eventually and inevitably, regulations would be stricken and deregulation will occur.
Mainly, I am referring to general regulations that protect the public from unscruplous growers using pesticides and causing enviromental damage and damage to human consuming such products and to any flora and fauna. In addition, you'll have people who will want to produce cannabis strictly to get rich by ripping people off. Also, you may see some towns, cities or states that would only want to produce medically or industrial cannabis on large scales. Again, as I said if anyone read over it, eventually and inevitably, regulations would be stricken and deregulation will occur.
Maybe someone with a medical background could help out, but I was thinking it would be cheaper and easier from a regulatory angle, to produce cannabis in its natural plant form instead of trying to produce cannabinoid based medicines. With what you mention above about FDA regulation, in addition, the equipment alone for producing such medicines is ungodly expensive. Not every hospital may be able to afford to produce their own medicine and thus would have to rely on bigger and more well-funded hospitals and limiting who could produce such medicines. I'm thinking that the fear of libel lawsuits would be enough to scare hosipital in making sure that research was performed correctly.
I picture recreational cannabis to evolve into something that is similiar to the alcholic beverage industry, but not the tobacco industry. The reason why I mention this is because cannabis can be consumed through various means other cigarette and pipe methods. These industries are fairly regulated, but people are still allowed to produce their own homemade alcohol. I think the recreational cannabis industry will evolve in this way.
Last edited: