burn the district of columbia,,, send em a messege,,
and the other cities
back to nature people, nothing to see here,,
and the other cities
back to nature people, nothing to see here,,
there is no doubt the GOP is a lost party with a shit platform and no viable leaders for president...
All the corporatist have to do is spin the 'evil'.
If i owned cotton, paper, biofuels, or beer companies, i wouldnt want to compete with MJ. Its bad for business.
...Unless i can make it synthetically and/or patent it!
there is no doubt the GOP is a lost party with a shit platform and no viable leaders for president...
I know that's right. Except for Ron Paul who is so much a real Republican that he don't have a Republican party.
Newt was willing to execute people with just 2 ounces or more of weed!!! I saw Gary Johnson say that. HOLYSHIT, I am eligible for the death penalty 1000 times over in my 20 years of smoking!
Got a link? Preferably to NEWT saying it? I dont really doubt, but i would like to hear it from Stay Puff's mouth.
.Blast from the Past: Newt and Drug War Logic
Steven L. Taylor · Tuesday, December 13, 2011
The Raw Story notes the following from Gary Johnson (aka the Forgotten Candidate): Gary Johnson: Gingrich ‘proposed the death penalty for marijuana’
“Newt Gingrich, in 1997, proposed the death penalty for marijuana — for possession of marijuana above a certain quantity of marijuana,” Johnson explained. “And yet, he is among 100 million Americans who’ve smoked marijuana.”
“I would love to have a discussion with him on the fact that he smoked pot, and under the wrong set of circumstance he proposed the death penalty for, potentially, something that he had committed. I have troubles with that,” he added.
Now, Johnson exaggerates a bit for effect: Newt didn’t propose executing the casual toker, but rather drug traffickers. However, as the RS piece notes, the amount that would qualify one as such was not exactly immense:
As Speaker of the House, Gingrich introduced the “Drug Importer Death Penalty Act of 1996.”
The bill would have required a “sentence of death for certain importations of significant quantities of controlled substances.” It would have applied to anyone convicted more than once of carrying 100 doses — or about two ounces — or marijuana across the border. Defendants would have had a window of 18 months to file their one and only appeal...
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/blast-from-the-past-newt-and-drug-war-logic/
Please someone tell me they understand the nuanced phasing Newt uses. I cant remember some who was so good at it in the last 20 years. He can twist any question to his own liking, and then spin a double answer ('im not going to attack Mitt, look at what the others who have attacked him have said')...
don't know if you saw this...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/...na-debate-hypocrisy_n_1227547.html?ref=comedy
Hmmmm...As Speaker of the House, Gingrich introduced the “Drug Importer Death Penalty Act of 1996.”
The bill would have required a “sentence of death for certain importations of significant quantities of controlled substances.” It would have applied to anyone convicted more than once of carrying 100 doses — or about two ounces — or marijuana across the border. Defendants would have had a window of 18 months to file their one and only appeal...
The 17th Congress has also been given the name The Congress of the Condemned, because of 1,996 party members present, 1,108 were arrested, and about two thirds of those executed within three years, largely during the Great Terror. Of the 139 members elected to the Central Committee in the 17th Congress, 98 would be executed in the purges. Of the remaining 41, only 24 would be re-elected to the Central Committee in the 18th Congress.[4]