spurr makes an extremely relevent point.
however, simplicity is the universal language regarding side-by-side. for, its NOT only the method, but the RESULTS.
we could forever intricate the varibles and controls, in the end, the results speak for themselves. i do not see this as a ''definitive'' conclusion to the black holes masked as unknowns, rather, a chance for the community to act as a collective of observations validated through REPEATED examples.
no matter where you start, that is always the beginning ; )
i am enthralled about the new science themed sub forums. if we could all agree on anything, as a community we know too much about too little.
however, simplicity is the universal language regarding side-by-side. for, its NOT only the method, but the RESULTS.
we could forever intricate the varibles and controls, in the end, the results speak for themselves. i do not see this as a ''definitive'' conclusion to the black holes masked as unknowns, rather, a chance for the community to act as a collective of observations validated through REPEATED examples.
no matter where you start, that is always the beginning ; )
i am enthralled about the new science themed sub forums. if we could all agree on anything, as a community we know too much about too little.