I wanted this thread to die, but since it didn't and is back at the top I wanna have my say on the whole situation.
It costs thousands a month to grow on that scale, its not like im trying to spend 400$ and sell 30k worth of weed. I have to be able to cover my costs, and pay my house payments- I do it for the sake of helping people but I expect to be re imbursed for my risk/costs
I am for recreational and medicinal use, i don't care if you like to get high or if you have to smoke to keep your HIV medicine down- weed is for everyone. I am a medical user, but I would still smoke even if I had no medical condtion, I am lucky enough to be bodily able and in fairly good physical shape, there are people who cannot make it to their cars to go get groceries- much less go get growing equipment, haul soil, go back and fourth buying nutes making trips to the hydro shop, and dealing with cops.
I see nothing ethically wrong with growing weed for medical patients and making a profit. If I heard of a sick person who didn't have any weed to smoke and couldn't afford to buy any then I would gladly give them some weed for free. I have been there plenty of times, as a matter of fact im in that spot right now but im not beating on dealers doors demanding free weed because I have no money.... For the rest of the people who are not terminally ill should have no problem paying for their medicine. If your not willing to pay for good buds, then grow your own unless like i said earlier, the person is terminally ill/ or disabled.
As far as state law goes I could only sell to authorized co-ops , dispensaries whatever term you use. So I would stick to that until I hear any further..... I am not concerned with federal law as it does not apply to a small operation. In my eyes federal law is un-constitutional due to states rights to make laws as they see fit. If the DEA dosn't like pot being grown in california then they need to go somewhere else. Thats just how i see it. There are more meth labs in Iowa than pot farms in california so i think thats a bigger fish to fry at the moment.
It costs thousands a month to grow on that scale, its not like im trying to spend 400$ and sell 30k worth of weed. I have to be able to cover my costs, and pay my house payments- I do it for the sake of helping people but I expect to be re imbursed for my risk/costs
I am for recreational and medicinal use, i don't care if you like to get high or if you have to smoke to keep your HIV medicine down- weed is for everyone. I am a medical user, but I would still smoke even if I had no medical condtion, I am lucky enough to be bodily able and in fairly good physical shape, there are people who cannot make it to their cars to go get groceries- much less go get growing equipment, haul soil, go back and fourth buying nutes making trips to the hydro shop, and dealing with cops.
I see nothing ethically wrong with growing weed for medical patients and making a profit. If I heard of a sick person who didn't have any weed to smoke and couldn't afford to buy any then I would gladly give them some weed for free. I have been there plenty of times, as a matter of fact im in that spot right now but im not beating on dealers doors demanding free weed because I have no money.... For the rest of the people who are not terminally ill should have no problem paying for their medicine. If your not willing to pay for good buds, then grow your own unless like i said earlier, the person is terminally ill/ or disabled.
As far as state law goes I could only sell to authorized co-ops , dispensaries whatever term you use. So I would stick to that until I hear any further..... I am not concerned with federal law as it does not apply to a small operation. In my eyes federal law is un-constitutional due to states rights to make laws as they see fit. If the DEA dosn't like pot being grown in california then they need to go somewhere else. Thats just how i see it. There are more meth labs in Iowa than pot farms in california so i think thats a bigger fish to fry at the moment.
Last edited: