What constitutes severe enough for immediate concern?
Any condition which is disruptive to a normal lifestyle. Disruptive could even mean distracting.
What constitutes severe enough for immediate concern?
I dont get the logic of some people. Why should I be exposed myself to serious side effects from "big pharma", which could and usually does lead to more severe health problems. When I can take a moderate to little amount of marijuana and have even better results.
I would only caution the wording of drug. Drugs produce physiological responses. Caffeine is a drug, nicotine is a drug, alcohol is a drug, cannabis is a drug, herbal remedies are drugs.
By the way not knocking you.
Anything that the patient/doctor deems severe enough.
It doesn't matter what judgment is placed by a 3rd party onlooker.
Are you against prop 215?
Well, one has got to be making an argument before you can have an ad hominem. I was making a comment, not an argument.
I also never admitted exaggerating to make a point. Isn't there a name for it when one posts a supposed fact like that as if it actually is a fact, and then tries to base future conversation on said assumed fact?
Frankly old man I've quit arguing with you. I could continue to do so, and I'm sure we could fill page after page, but to what end? It's very annoying to me when two posters lock horns and do that, and so I'm not interested in participating. I've said my piece on the other matter you've brought up as well.
You used a hangnail in your comment/argument. Then you state "sure people who use that are exaggerating." Then what did you do? -- exaggerated.
So you know, far from old man -- late twenties here.
It simply requires a doctors approval and it's up to the physicians to choose if weed will make a person feel better. Ina world where prozac and zoloft are pushed on the masses to make everyone happy why the fuck are supposed stoners arguing the merits of 215?has been recommended by a physician who has determined that the person's health would benefit from the use of marijuana in the treatment of cancer, anorexia, AIDS, chronic pain, spasticity, glaucoma, arthritis, migraine, or any other illness for which marijuana provides relief.
This is exactly where your age shows its weakness. You are too young to remember when Dan Lungren as the California Attorney General proudly announced that people can get Medical Marijuana for a hangnail if prop 215 passed. It was a scare tactic that backfired in their face and us stoners get to benefit from forever.
Oh and the definition of Seriously Ill means jack squat moot shit nothing. Because
It simply requires a doctors approval and it's up to the physicians to choose if weed will make a person feel better. Ina world where prozac and zoloft are pushed on the masses to make everyone happy why the fuck are supposed stoners arguing the merits of 215?
Ah, one of life's rhetorical questions...Why is it that when someone has a differing opinion, the other almost always thinks that person is "against" or the enemy?
I'm not sure how it hurts the movement if it already in place?I am against people who make a mockery out of it for personal gain that hurts the MMJ movement.
WRI know "seriously ill"means jack shit. Did you not read my post just a few up about how the section contradicts itself???
I brought up the question for discussion for us to speculate on why it was written into the section if it serves no purpose? Do you get that?My take is MMJ law is written to pass so loopholes are written in.Some are later bargained out of the law. others make it through. In this case the scope of use was not known so rather than force a group to advocate for inclusion a reverse position is created and exclusion becomes the exception. A compassionate stance over an exclusionary one is prefered for a benign herb like cannabis
I personally disassociate from the label stoner and prefer MMJ user. Stoner is too closely associated with a recreational user.
Call your self what you will, but I ask you; Are you against recreational use and why?I mean we are talking about a very safe herb here not alcohol or tobacco. So maybe you can answer my 64,000$ question. It is virtually harmless so why are some medical users such rabid haters of rec users? As I pointed out although medical use never truly died out it was and rec users who rediscovered the medical aspects so why all the animosity from med stoners?
BlueDot said:Whereas my chronic migraines come and go frequently throughout the year, each and every year until I die.
It's cool. But I have to disagree cannabis is the herb, cannabinoids are the pro-drugs within that when separated from the plant become drugs. That line of reasoning is very dangerous as many things we eat each day contain pro-drugs and produce physiological responses, cayenne, horseradish,poppy seed and nutmeg for example would be drugs by your definition as all produce prominant physiological responses and do contain substances that when extracted are in fact drugs.
Not trying to split hairs here just keeping things in their place. If we begin to define plants as drugs then far too many plants would have to be labled as such and only labling the popular ones drugs is inaccurate.
until some deep paradigm shifts occur in the perception of bodily systems, cannabis medicine is just herbal therapy, very effective herbal therapy
WR
Can sick people not get their meds now because others are abusing the system (under your judgment)?
YES, here in San Diego Bonnie Dumanis believes dispensaries are abusing the system so she shut them down and now I, as a patient, don't have access to those meds.
Direct cause and effect.
Stop abusing the system people so patients like me and everyone else can have access to meds.
That is the error of Bonnie Dumanis, not the other patients that you don't feel deserve medicinal devil weed.YES, here in San Diego Bonnie Dumanis believes dispensaries are abusing the system so she shut them down and now I, as a patient, don't have access to those meds.
Stop abusing the system people so patients like me and everyone else can have access to meds.
That is the error of Bonnie Dumanis, not the other patients that you don't feel deserve medicinal devil weed.
Many would say that you are abusing the system by smoking weed for your headaches. Do you listen to them?
Are all of these places really shut down?
http://www.sandiegocannabisclubs.com/directory/
There are several Dispensaries operating in San Diego-- Do I really need to post them? Or can you follow a link??
http://www.cannashops.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=212
Are all of these places really shut down?
http://www.sandiegocannabisclubs.com/directory/