N
noyd666
most have there day in court and pay the penalty.
I think here the cops are allowed to stop you and ask questions (on the street) but that you don't have to answer if you don't want. Not 100% sure though.yeah i'd not try the freeman stuff in court. specially as i don't comprehend the rules in court. what does interest me is stopping cops on the street from doing their whole "routine" search thing. this doesn't need to involve legal advise, it can be presented as a hypothetical story.
the reason this is particular interesting to me is because where i live, cops always ask to search you, they don't order it, same when they want your id, when on foot they ask, in a car they demand the driving license. makes you wonder if they are doing so because they actually don't have the right to force you to empty your pockets for their inspection when on foot, unless they have probable cause.
I think here the cops are allowed to stop you and ask questions (on the street) but that you don't have to answer if you don't want. Not 100% sure though.
Could you please further explain what you mean here. Are you saying the Knights of Malta run the BAR association and Western medicine? INdeed what is Western medicine? Are you talking about specific drug companies? Hospitals? Doctors? How do they do that? What is your evidence? What is this mysterious country no one has heard of?Nope, wait.
something else that needs to be explained is these Knights of Malta aswell as being the hub from which the BAR association, extends throughout the protestest world, also monopolised western medicine.
Destroyed their competitors around 100 years ago.
And used their control of the courts, through their other arm, to license certain drugs aswell as prohibit others.
There is some circumstantial evidence that marijuana, which used to be an over the counter medicine, can cure cancer. And that cancer, which was almost unheard of prior to vaccination, may have been introduced intentionally.
Eradicating the cure would be a good idea if your intention was to quietly kill millions of protestants through cancer.
There are many theories on why marijuana was outlawed, and this one has no more merit than any other, as far as I know.
But this connection may prove useful to someone like Mr Mulloway, if he ever finds himself in front of a jury.
But the major point being, the BAR Association and Western medicine are run by the same people.That reside in a country noone has ever heard of. And has no lawful power in Australia to tell us what to do. Anymore than the Vatican does. But that's how they unify drug prohibition.
Western medicine being identifiable by its logo the cadaceus. Which also tells you who the temple is to. a temple being a place of worship of course.
But that might be an area too weird for most, and while being relevant in court to me, maybe too twilight zone for most.
Thanks. A quick google and they don't appear that sinister.I told you.
The midde temple has a website.
It proudly claimed until 2 months ago on its own website
a) it is a soverign state. Seperate from the soverign city of london
b) That the country's inhabitants or owners are the Soverign Knights of Malta
c) that they are the head of the BAr association
d) they are under Vatican authority (thats still on there as of a week ago)
( i just googled this link for you by typing middle temple into google and pressing the enter button, then clicking the middletemple http://http://www.middletemple.org.uk/home/ )
For Knights of Malta being the nominal head of freemasonry , you'll have to search a number of sources and make that evaluation by your own lights.
Western medicine same thing. But western medicine is how I discovered them in the first place. not through the law. For medicine try looking into the Knights of Stjohn. (as in stjohns ambulance. Or the knights of Malta ( as in the maltese cross you will see in hospitals) or the Knights Hospitaller , which is self explanatory ((hopefully)) )
these 3 orders are one and the same.
The mystery country is the soverign state known as "the temple"
and they have 2 seats on the united nations. as of a few years ago , when i was looking into them.
Not sure if you could call it a sovereign state?Inner Temple and Middle Temple are two of the few remaining liberties, an old name for a geographic division. They are independent extra-parochial areas,[10] historically not governed by the City of London Corporation[11] (and are today regarded as local authorities for most purposes[12]) and equally outside the ecclesiastical jurisdiction of the Bishop of London. They geographically fall within the boundaries and liberties of the City of London, but can be thought of as independent enclaves. They both are part of the City ward of Farringdon Without.
d) When I google this I get some youtube clips! I can't find it on the middle temple website but have not read it all.The Middle Temple and the other three Inns of Court were established by the middle of the 14th century. The Inn's name derives from the Knights Templar who had been in possession of the Temple site for over 150 years prior to that.
Satan worship!Hard rain , no they don't advertise that they're worshipping satan in their temple and running half the world.
I should imagine if that was what they were doing, they'd be decent enough to say so.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freemen_on_the_land
A quote from wiki (hate using wiki but it is at least more accurate than most of the info in this thread).
Meads v Meads
The Canadian case of Meads v Meads (2012 ABQB 571) comprehensively reviewed the freemen arguments from a legal standpoint.[9]
Dennis Larry Meads of Edmonton, Alberta, stormed out of a Court of Queen's Bench hearing on June 8, 2012, related to his divorce and matrimonial property case. In response, Associate Chief Justice John D. Rooke wrote a lengthy and comprehensive 185-page judgment rejecting various freemen claims, grouping them with other pseudolegal arguments as "Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Arguments" (OPCA), specifically, in this case, Meads' Freeman on the Land claims, arguments and documents,[10] saying that:
The bluntly idiotic substance of Mr. Mead’s argument explains the unnecessarily complicated manner in which it was presented. OPCA arguments are never sold to their customers as simple ideas, but instead are byzantine schemes which more closely resemble the plot of a dark fantasy novel than anything else. Latin maxims and powerful sounding language are often used. Documents are often ornamented with many strange marking and seals. Litigants engage in peculiar, ritual‑like in court conduct. All these features appear necessary for gurus to market OPCA schemes to their often desperate, ill‑informed, mentally disturbed, or legally abusive customers. This is crucial to understand the non-substance of any OPCA concept or strategy. The story and process of a OPCA scheme is not intended to impress or convince the Courts, but rather to impress the guru’s customer.[9
-----------------------------------------------------
I agree with this judge. which is why i reject freeman disinofrmation.
Treason defence is simple and straightforward.
It has the weight of law behind it.
It is a highly principled stand and will not be mocked.
It supercedes the judges power to undermine it.
(and it works)
Thanks for the link hardrain. I hope you look at the above video I recommended for you. I'm trying to be as polite as possible.
General executor-
How is best to begin this administrative process in australia?
Thanks for sharing your wealth of knowledge