Is Gobal Cooling a Continuing Threat?
no, but evidently it will be a continuing thread.......
no, but evidently it will be a continuing thread.......
BBC: Do you agree that from 1995 to the present there has been no statistically-significant global warming
Phil Jones: Yes, but only just. I also calculated the trend for the period 1995 to 2009. This trend (0.12C per decade) is positive, but not significant at the 95% significance level. The positive trend is quite close to the significance level. Achieving statistical significance in scientific terms is much more likely for longer periods, and much less likely for shorter periods.
BBC: How confident are you that warming has taken place and that humans are mainly responsible?
Phil Jones: I'm 100% confident that the climate has warmed. As to the second question, I would go along with IPCC Chapter 9 - there's evidence that most of the warming since the 1950s is due to human activity.
I have already addressed the MWP. Please stop with the lies.H3ad you have failed to address the points made here:
Earlier this year, a paper by Michael Mann - for years a leading light in the IPCC, and the author of the infamous 'hockey stick graph' showing flat temperatures for 2,000 years until the recent dizzying increase - made an extraordinary admission: that, as his critics had always claimed, there had indeed been a ' medieval warm period' around 1000 AD, when the world may well have been hotter than it is now.
Other research is beginning to show that cyclical changes in water vapour - a much more powerful greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide - may account for much of the 20th Century warming.
Even Phil Jones, the CRU director at the centre of last year's 'Climategate' leaked email scandal, was forced to admit in a littlenoticed BBC online interview that there has been 'no statistically significant warming' since 1995.
Why should we listen to skepticalscience.com rather than wattsupwiththat.com?
It even lists the pro-warming sites on the side bar so you can easily access them... seems there are way more sites on the 'skeptics' side...
Your site is also just a blog yes?
The situation is not blog vs. blog. The situation is: a political anti-science sentiment expressed in media, blogs, and congressmen vs. scientific consensus.
How come SCIENCE never admits it knows jack shit.
Climate cycles take thousands of years it's a fact.Actually, you wouldn't know anything about natural climate cycles without scientists--those who study natural climate cycles and have enough experience to comment on them. Weather-guy meteorology has very little to do with the science of global climate.
These same scientists have found that the natural cycles do not explain current climate trends.
Because CO2 isn't the only driver of climate. But is it verifiably a major driver of climate and is observably driving the current warming.Its all just blah blah if you cant explain. In laymens terms. How the climate could have been warmer in the medievil period. With no factories, power plants or SUV's putting out the c02. Because co2 is the main driver to climate right?
ahahahaha you'll fall for buying water in the future also. lolBecause CO2 isn't the only driver of climate. But is it verifiable driving the current warming.
educate yourself... ALL your questions have ALREADY been answered.
www.skepticalscience.com
ahahahaha you'll fall for buying water in the future also. lol
this guy loves whatever science tells him, stop worshipping science.
Follow the money, not the propaganda
lol. Amazing how people can get obsessed over something as trivial as the weather. There's much more important things going on.
The oil companies stand the most to gain from a carbon tax.
Wakey wakey voice of the silly season.
You are the victims of mind control. I could list 10 much more urgent and real threats to the natural order of our planet.
What a dooshnozzle you are
ahahahaha you'll fall for buying water in the future also. lol
lol. Amazing how people can get obsessed over something as trivial as the weather. There's much more important things going on.
The oil companies stand the most to gain from a carbon tax.