caregiver77
New member
Thanks for the thoughtful reply Carl, but I'm going to have to disagree with you.
That article seems to pretty specifically argue against all hempy buckets. The "Perched Water Table" is a design element of the hempy bucket, and the success of hempy buckets flys in the face of what this article would predict. In fact, if you look at the DaliaHempy's posts here and on other boards, you'll see many people told him it would not work for this very reason, a dead zone at the bottom of the bucket where lack of oxygen prevented healthy root growth.
It seems this is overcome by the nature of medium used in Hempy buckets. I doubt a pure soil Hempy bucket would work very well at all.
I have tried 100% coco all the way to the bottom with very poor results, even when I used the coarse Sunleaves piece coir at the bottom. The girls stalled out and needed to be transplanted in both cases. Many others ( including Hempy himself) have shown that the perlite/hydroton/rock bottom is essential when using coco in Hempy buckets.
As for the 50/50 blend in the middle and 100% coco at top, well I can't defend that as readily. My thinking about it is as follows: From personal experience and that of some others, plants grown in coco cut with perlite perform better than those without. This is a contentious point and I can't say my opinion on it is any more valid than any other. However, I'm much more prone to follow my own opinion huh? ha!
So why the top layer of 100% coco? Well a few reasons... The top layer does not receive as much moisture wicking from reservoir as the middle. After irrigating (slowly and evenly) the top layer will retain more solution after flow-through than if it were cut with perlite. The top layer is also exposed to circulating air and moisture will evaporate faster anyways. I feel (backed up by post harvest root-ball inspections) that this water retaining top layer creates a larger, more even rhizosphere in the bucket.
That article seems to pretty specifically argue against all hempy buckets. The "Perched Water Table" is a design element of the hempy bucket, and the success of hempy buckets flys in the face of what this article would predict. In fact, if you look at the DaliaHempy's posts here and on other boards, you'll see many people told him it would not work for this very reason, a dead zone at the bottom of the bucket where lack of oxygen prevented healthy root growth.
It seems this is overcome by the nature of medium used in Hempy buckets. I doubt a pure soil Hempy bucket would work very well at all.
I have tried 100% coco all the way to the bottom with very poor results, even when I used the coarse Sunleaves piece coir at the bottom. The girls stalled out and needed to be transplanted in both cases. Many others ( including Hempy himself) have shown that the perlite/hydroton/rock bottom is essential when using coco in Hempy buckets.
As for the 50/50 blend in the middle and 100% coco at top, well I can't defend that as readily. My thinking about it is as follows: From personal experience and that of some others, plants grown in coco cut with perlite perform better than those without. This is a contentious point and I can't say my opinion on it is any more valid than any other. However, I'm much more prone to follow my own opinion huh? ha!
So why the top layer of 100% coco? Well a few reasons... The top layer does not receive as much moisture wicking from reservoir as the middle. After irrigating (slowly and evenly) the top layer will retain more solution after flow-through than if it were cut with perlite. The top layer is also exposed to circulating air and moisture will evaporate faster anyways. I feel (backed up by post harvest root-ball inspections) that this water retaining top layer creates a larger, more even rhizosphere in the bucket.