You left out the fact that the CO2 was produced from a reaction left uncontrolled. You left out the fact that the vessel was made from brittle cast iron. You left out the fact that the incident is famous due to its necessitating the advent of the pressure release safety disc. Said advent makes your mention of this horror tale unnecessary except to discourage research. You then post the research you claim to deplore, in video form.
If I was going to post the tale of the Parisian discovery and harnessing of liquid CO2, I'd point to it as proof that proper procedure will result in safe extraction. Tolerances, stainless steel, pressure burst discs. I wouldn't omit facts about the event in an attempt to twist what happened toward my argument. BTW nice post edit months ago to hide the fact that you got chloroform and methanol confused. You sure know how to copy and paste, except for when you botch it. Don't try to deny it because I saw you.
Thank you for admitting that the M. stands for Monsieur and that as such your attempt to portray it as his middle initial is absurd. Your assignment of an arbitrary nickname to the person, along with your shallow attempt to paint Mellor as the assignitor, speaks much of your motives while communicating little in the way of fact.
If this is your view and not a decision to go trolling every few months, you have serious, fundamental problems that are unrelated to this site and uninteresting to me.
Last edited: