So u would prefer CMH over the Gavita?
Lifespan would be shortened due to DE ballasts operate on a ultra high freq sine wave, the 315 was designed to run on LFSW. The high freq sine is going to cause resonance in the lamp shortening its life by how much would probably depend on the ballast and amount of thd.Thats wuts up, cant wait to hear yall results. The only thing i didnt get with the de double ended 630 was they said its life span could be shortned. Just wonder by how much...
Even if you don't do a full grow on here please just update what you see running the 630s in the acdes. I run all acde and I hope to put a few of the double ended metal halide in this winter. I tried 6 of the 315s over a 5x8 last winter and the while the quality was superb the penetration was not close compared to the 2 1000s next to it. The plants were big which also didn't help but I think the new 1000 watt metal halide might have some real potential.
I can't wait to see the differences between same clones strains under each light type.
Fluence spyderX plus VS DE ePapillion vs 630CMH!!!!!
I'm going to run a Nanolux DE-4x4 next to their CMH 630w Dual bulb fixture in a 4x8 gorilla tent. I might run one fixture at a time on a light mover or both spaced out, or both on the mover... not sure yet how this will play out yet.